Oh my. Now I’m making nonsensical generalizations. Sigh. I’m not one to insult people, even online. But I have noticed a dig with each comment and it’s really not necessary.
I’m sorry if you’re taking it that way. I do believe your argument is making generalizations that are nonsensical. That’s not really intended to be a personal insult.
I could have bought a new BMW at the height of the pandemic and done way better in terms of depreciation, even compared to my used Tesla. Of course I would not have paid ADM.
Then, to put it bluntly, you very likely would not have bought a car because nobody would sell you one. BMW’s year over year transaction price was up nearly 15% from 2021 to 2022.
New-vehicle buyers remain in an "over sticker" market, paying above MSRP every month this year. Inventory improves year-over-year but remains low; incentives increased slightly in July over June...
mediaroom.kbb.com
I am also seeing Taycan values taking massive hits now. I’m not sure about BMW EV values but I see a whole lot of them discounted at the local dealer. So yeah, it sure seems to me like price drops and significant depreciation may extend to the overall EV market.
Yes - price drops and significant depreciation has extended to the ENTIRE vehicle market, as the bubble has popped and interest rates are at 20 year highs.
I don’t think I’m the only one who places a lot of importance on depreciation. Again, when depreciation on EVs was low, that was a selling point. Now that depreciation is high, it’s not fair to say that depreciation shouldn’t matter.
Again, this is generally applicable to the entire auto market. The same trends are affecting everything.
Yes, if you measure depreciation from a pure transaction price perspective when new and then however many years later, EVs depreciate faster. The two main reasons for this are:
1) the emerging technology aspect I mentioned in an earlier post
2) Market manipulation via government incentives. Almost every new EV sold for the past decade has received significant government incentives via tax credits and local rebates. Those obviously affect resale value and show up as “depreciation” the way most firms like KBB and others calculate it. You can’t really call that depreciation from the owner’s perspective though as you were compensated for it.
Example: you buy an EV for $57,500 and get a $7500 federal tax credit. Your car is now worth about $7500 less on the open market than it would be otherwise (because why would someone buy your car when they can get a new one with their own $7500 coupon). Is that “depreciation”? My answer is “no” even though it shows up that way in most market analyses.
A personal example with real (but rounded) numbers:
I bought a Model S for ~$80,000 in 2016. I put 175,000 miles on it and just sold it for ~$20,000. Per traditional measures of depreciation that KBB or others could calculate with the records available to them, my car depreciated by 75% over my ownership.
However, I received $13,000 of federal, state, and local incentives when I purchased the car, making my “real” transaction price $67,000 and my observed depreciation only 70%. Whose numbers are correct, and how would this compare to an ICE model over the same 7 years and 175k miles?
Maybe we could agree that it would be better if Tesla’s could hold their values like they did in the past and leave it at that.
I dunno. This seems like a very necessary correction to me. Prices were astronomically high and had to come down one way or another.