tftf
Member
So, just throwing it out there. They are building a factory to double worldwide battery production and they are doing it with partners and part of this business is obviously grid storage. Doesn't it make sense for Tesla Motors to be a part owner in a new company, perhaps one called Tesla Energy? The other companies would also own part of this new company so the capital cost to Tesla Motors would be significantly reduced at the cost of sharing the earnings. It would sell battery packs to any car maker that wants them although only Tesla Motors would sell complete drivetrains.
A new company could make sense if there are multiple partners involved (and multiple partners were hinted at by Tesla). However, I don't see large car competitors buying batteries from TSLA (or the new company) except for maybe Daimler or Toyota as current TSLA investors. Toyota execs not warming up to pure BEVs at the moment would only have Daimler remaining as a partner and/or future customer in my opinion.
Even if would make sense financially I don't see competitors buying from TSLA on principle / for strategic reasons. Also, batteries are heavy and expensive to ship, other companies (Nissand and also re-born Saab as it starts EV production in 2014) produce batteries directly in their main sales regions: Nissan in all three key markets (NA, Europe and Japan) and Saab in China.
As others mentioned, some partners for the giga factory could be from outside the auto industry (obivously Panasonic as a likely candidate, maybe SCTY, IT companies like GOOG...)