It means that Elon will be dinged by insider trading if Q4 is a surprise to the downside. So the fact that he was allowed to sell and the board approved means Q4's performance should be fine.Not sure I am following, but this seems relevant:
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It means that Elon will be dinged by insider trading if Q4 is a surprise to the downside. So the fact that he was allowed to sell and the board approved means Q4's performance should be fine.Not sure I am following, but this seems relevant:
Between these inopportune share dumps and his political comments & rantings lately, it really does feel like Elon wants TSLA to go down.
This is like sci-fi movie script come to life. Boy wonder and the villians. Add in the Fusion breakthrough... it all seems surreal lately. But I also take you seriously and will be watching for this now.Especially after my recent experience with OpenAI's Chatbot, and discovering how natural and convincing AI has become, even on nuanced subjects involving complex situations, I have a little different take:
How do you know the "investors" you're debating TSLA with are not AI bots?
Those who think this is funny or far-fetched need to tell me their reasoning. Because I actually find it more likely than not that more than half of the persistent but generally short debates/conversations taking place in comment sections/forums around the Internet about global warming, solar power, EV adoption and Tesla and related subjects are AI bots, not humans. My reasoning is a disconnect between the amount of time these debaters are willing to spend on what amounts to a debate that has played out the same way thousands of times before (not that humans wouldn't do this, but the frequency of it seems a little "off"). The other reason - I think I'm beginning to detect a certain style that distinguishes some of these debates from a human. It's quite subtle but they seem to be a little too matter of fact, in other words, better than most humans at avoiding personal emotion and this makes them sound more convincing.
Also, the incentive and motivation is there to fund such disinformation to make these false narratives sound reasonable to the masses. I will still spend my time to counter their false narratives, but only because I know that hundreds, sometimes thousands, of innocent humans read the comments. But I really think I'm most often debating a chat bot designed to twist reality.
I think the brave new world of AI is being widely deployed much faster than most are aware.
Baron's Retail Fund, owns both tlsa and SpaceXIf I knew where to buy them or shares in a fund that bought them, I'd buy them in a heartbeat!
Ha! Now I've got to find out if I have a heartbeat!Baron's Retail Fund, owns both tlsa and SpaceX
I’m really hoping $153 was the bottom, just so that ‘technically’ chicken genius was wrong! But my god, his accuracy on this was impressive.
I had to go apology tweet to him yesterday for calling him names back in august when he was screaming SELL, and calling for $150.
We were at my daughters HS event and chatting with other parents. One said they were looking at getting their daughter a Blazer EV, I nearly spit my drink out. I'm not one of those Tesla ambassador types but I had to say something. I tried to push him to read more about EVs and not to gobble up the BS GM narratives, look at the actual EV battery tech, it's not all the same. Lotta noobs to EV have really scarirly poor understanding of the technology.This is like sci-fi movie script come to life. Boy wonder and the villians. Add in the Fusion breakthrough... it all seems surreal lately. But I also take you seriously and will be watching for this now.
Only problem is how do I explain this to my neighbors who are still hung up on range anxiety, along with what is electricity anyway, and is it Watt or WOT? I feel like I'm talking to a bunch of cats! Ya, it's that bad around here.
Well there are a lot of numbers between 300+ and 150. So calling the direction can be attributed to Elon. Calling the actual number on the other hand.....Elon bailed him out, imho. He got lucky.
So two months now of non-stop FUD spread by not just Rueter....ahem..."others" as well. Hope they're happy with themselves. Rueter's you expect this type of crap fun. The others, need to get off their high horse.
Hey mate, what's the stock symbol (to save me some searching)?Ha! Now I've got to find out if I have a heartbeat!
I was reading "likely now", where Gary wrote "Odds of a negative 4Q surprise are therefore likely low.", that´s why it didn´t make sense - really scared myselfIt means that Elon will be dinged by insider trading if Q4 is a surprise to the downside. So the fact that he was allowed to sell and the board approved means Q4's performance should be fine.
BPTRXHey mate, what's the stock symbol (to save me some searching)?
Merci beaucoup mon ami!
Here's the orginal version from Consumer Reports yesterday:![]()
Tesla, Kia and Nissan electric vehicles are the most reliable: Consumer Reports
Tesla has ranked highly in an EV reliability survey conducted by Consumer Reports, joined at the top by Nissan and Kia. Consumer Reports conducts surveys that reach hundreds of thousands of car owners, allowing them […]driveteslacanada.ca