For sure. They must know that EVs are the future, but they have to deal with the inevitable profit crash that will happen if they go full EV (and the resulting loss of executive bonuses).Okay - I have said this before and it didn't go down well.
1) Tesla are accelerating sustainable transport
and
2) In some cases decelerating sustainable transport
The IPace is too ambitious IMO. They felt like they could and should take on Tesla directly and beat them at their own game without 10 years prior experience. They have done a great job but sometimes getting 90% towards your target means falling into the chasm. A Defender replacement (like Bollinger) would have allowed JLR to experiment without any embarrassment whatsoever. Hyundai and Taycan news today backs this up further. If these guys can't make a profit, I don't see them wholeheartedly going for it. We predicted they would be in a pickle - we were right. If they collectively have a shareholder's backlash that stops them investing - they will all be doomed. They have a long way down before they can start rising from the ashes - best to start now or wait? If Tesla hadn't been as good, they would be making profit and investing further. I realise that this is not what most of you think, but I just have to say it again to get it off my chest.
Releasing cars in low volume, long periods of teasing before cars come to market etc. are all just hedging. They seem to want some EV experience and street cred without upending their entire business.