humbaba
sleeping until $7000
I don't do margin, but that would get me looking for another broker...IN FACT I just noticed that in my etrade account they have literally ISSUED ME A CALL for no dollars with no due date.
View attachment 444854
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't do margin, but that would get me looking for another broker...IN FACT I just noticed that in my etrade account they have literally ISSUED ME A CALL for no dollars with no due date.
View attachment 444854
Nope, prior to this weirdness they've always treated me great. I'm not ready to bail on them.I don't do margin, but that would get me looking for another broker...
How do you know Walmart’s concerns are legitimate? How do you know Tesla did not do everything it could to keep a big customer happy?
Maybe Walmart’s demands were unreasonable. Asking for removal of all 200 systems could surely qualify as being unreasonable. Maybe Walmart simply wants to get rid of these systems for other reasons. Who knows?
This board is drawing a lot of harsh conclusions based on only one side of the story.
Walmart did not ask for system removal after the third fire. Only after years of SC/Tesla not doing its job did it turn into this. In any case, after the 3'rd fire, Tesla should have rewired all of those systems or at least looked at them VERY closely. That would have been the end of this story and Tesla might have lost 1-3 million. After the 4'th fire, I would have wanted all of the systems removed too. And Tesla should have done that as well. Eat the loss and move on. Pay out for the damages. But no, they stonewalled leading us to this train wreck.How do you know Walmart’s concerns are legitimate? How do you know Tesla did not do everything it could to keep a big customer happy?
Maybe Walmart’s demands were unreasonable. Asking for removal of all 200 systems could surely qualify as being unreasonable. Maybe Walmart simply wants to get rid of these systems for other reasons. Who knows?
This board is drawing a lot of harsh conclusions based on only one side of the story.
Don't stop there, sell it all. Go big or go home. If it's not good enough for the 20% you sold, just sell the other 80% and be done with it.
I believe that early adopter (software updates->advanced) is at the front of a wide release, i.e. might start getting updates @4weeks as per communications above and it might take couple of weeks(based on geography/other), after which the rest of the fleet gets it, which takes another couple of weeks and so, takes 8 weeks for the last in line.
But they really shouldn't expose this internal mechanics, with the original statement it kinda sounds like it might take 8 weeks for everybody.
Visiting a friend the circumstances required that I park behind him in the driveway. When he left he just backed around my car. On return he said, "you'll need to move it" so I whipped out the phone and rolled it back into the street. He pulled in and I returned it. That maneuver impressed him at least as much as when he was in the car.No, but when you pull your car out of the garage standing there with your phone, neighbors, friends, enemies, everyone takes notice. It’s almost as if you can’t believe it’s happening, no one ever thought a car could do this. It’s the “jaw-drop” moment.
From kids to adults, they all begin dreaming about doing that themselves. It’s not only the future of autonomous driving, it’s also an amazing sales tool, whether by design or not.
Don't be silly. I assume you're familiar with probability distributions? As a retail investor, I have no way of knowing for sure what the future holds for a given company or stock. Ideally, the proportion of my assets invested in a given company will at least roughly match the level of risk I'm willing to accept in connection with that company. I'm obviously still willing to accept a lot of risk with Tesla (and we own multiple Tesla products).Don't stop there, sell it all. Go big or go home. If it's not good enough for the 20% you sold, just sell the other 80% and be done with it.
In any case, after the 3'rd fire, Tesla should have rewired all of those systems or at least looked at them VERY closely. That would have been the end of this story and Tesla might have lost 1-3 million.
Eventually Elon will realize that the issue is he’s delusional on FSD timeline and stop firing so many talented people
Read this.You are not privy to enough details and facts to make such silly statements.
Hint: A filing for a lawsuit has CLAIMED facts, not ESTABLISHED facts.
Don't stop there, sell it all. Go big or go home. If it's not good enough for the 20% you sold, just sell the other 80% and be done with it.
And how do you know Musk fired him? The fact that he picked up a job at another company? That's... pretty weak. I've seen other comments here about him being "forced out" and I don't know what facts those are based on, but I do know that Musk is very willing to outright fire individuals -- no matter how talented -- if they do not produce results and I've yet to see news that Stuart Bowers was fired.
One can argue about the effect this has on morale, but the reality is that Musk gets results. He was told that the StarLink launch could not happen on schedule. He disagreed, and after the dust settled (with some engineers having to look for a new job) the StarLink launch did happen.
He is just as serious about FSD, and if you can't produce results you'd better be able to demonstrate effectiveness in your job or you will be fired. The indications are that Stuart Bowers was not fired, but that he "pursued other opportunities." If that is in fact what happened then he knew his days at Tesla were numbered, but it is also possible that his valuable work experience got him a better paying job with a whole lot less stress.
Blue Origin has tried the "steal SpaceX tech and poach the employees" but hasn't yet become a competitor to SpaceX. The same has been tried against Tesla, and so far with similar lack of results. Tesla may be a pressure cooker to work at, but it is a pressure cooker that gets results.
Not according to this poster Tesla restructures Autopilot software team, Elon takes the reins : teslamotorsStuart Bowers is very talented
I posted in another thread and got downvoted to hell (of course). I worked with Stuart at 2 of his previous 3 companies. The guy is a fraud. He lied about the degree of his seniority at Facebook and he parlayed that into Snap (which he lied about his seniority there too). Then, he parlayed that into Tesla where he got a legit title. I was blown away Elon decided to hire him after seeing his work (and honestly, how junior he actually was). Only 12 total years and a VP of a major tech company would require some serious chops.
Maybe people will believe me now. /shrug
Elon has been wrong about AP progress how many times now? When will people understand he is straight up delusional about AP related timelines. Enhanced Summon is a great example. Approaching almost a year since it was 2-4 weeks ago according to Musk
In the art of war you are advised to speak powerfully when you are weak and humbly when strong. Elon has not said a word about Shanghai but has been chatty about FSD. Maybe it’s more work then he wants to admit, or he’s just softening up the world to get ready for self driving.Not unless there's a secret factory under construction somewhere.
I think Musk is betting a lot more on Robotaxi than people realize. He believes robotaxi economics will transform Tesla from a struggling carmaker into a true tech giant. And wow-ing people with self-driving is a lot more fun than grinding away at the "Game of Pennies". During Autonomy Day he said 100% of their spending was directed at FSD. That's not literally true, but he meant what he said. Roadster, Semi and Pickup are no longer priorities.
Read this.
Walmart Inc v Tesla Energy | Solar City | Solar Cell
Look at it. Its over 100 pages, but its pretty damning. Photos. Timelines. And surprisingly few demands from Walmart other then fixing it and paying for expenses.
No, Tesla has not put forth their side. But looking at what I see so far, Tesla has performed VERY badly. Do not mistake me for a short or a troll, I have a good amount of Tesla stock. I thoroughly believe in the future of Tesla, but am deeply disappointed when they make COSTLY mistakes like this. SC was a trainwreck. But the bleeding on this issue (Walmart) could have stopped a while ago. It looks like Tesla has just brushed this aside and certainly has not gone to each site and given it a re-do like they should. They have treated this like they have treated the worst of automotive customers.
I’m amazed anyone cares about this Summon gimmick. I did not buy a Tesla EV because I wanted to summon the car.
How do you know Walmart’s concerns are legitimate? How do you know Tesla did not do everything it could to keep a big customer happy?
Maybe Walmart’s demands were unreasonable. Asking for removal of all 200 systems could surely qualify as being unreasonable. Maybe Walmart simply wants to get rid of these systems for other reasons. Who knows?
This board is drawing a lot of harsh conclusions based on only one side of the story.