kengchang
Active Member
Some guy do transmission, some guy do tri-motors ![Big Grin :D :D]()
![Big Grin :D :D]()
![Big Grin :D :D]()
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not me; I honestly didn't call that they'd be making a special track edition. I figured they'd just put on some track tires on an otherwise stock Model S, say, "Hey, it's more stock than the Porsche", edge out its time by a bit, and call it done. I had no idea that their plans were this ambitious![]()
In what way could the batteries be improved over other P100D?
"Yes. To be clear, Plaid powertrain is about a year away from production & applies to S,X & Roadster, but not 3 or Y. Will cost more than our current offerings, but less than competitors."
Hmmm, so not available on Tesla's current and most capable platform, but will be on a 7 and 5 year old platform and a future one not released yet?
Wow.From peoples' comments, I guess most of you are all fine with Tesla apparently conceding "Taycan is a better track car than any Tesla you can get for the next year, and that's assuming that there's no schedule slips and no improvement by anyone else in the meantime". E.g., just abandoning the "we make the best EVs, period" halo effect. Also, apparently, fine with reinforcing the (false) notion that's already been hurting S and X sales, that the current (Raven) S and X are dated cars with overheating problems. Also no interest in doing anything to boost S and X sales in the near term so that they can add more shifts and get better utilization out of their existing capital investments.
Okay, so you're fine with that. I'm not. But the crowd has clearly spoken.
It doesn't need another motor - it's already faster than the Porsche Taycan fer crying out loud! All it needs is brakes, tires, stiffer springs, more damping and beefed up cooling to handle extended track usage.
Probably cost $20K more. Unless they want to turn it into a real profit center, then they'll tack on 30K.
Hopefully the car which makes the actual record run will have roll cage, full harness, etc.
It's not a course that forgives fools.
But wouldn’t you like torque vectoring with that?
Magna shows Tesla that three motors are better than two when it comes to corners
Nah, I don't think it would be 3 PMSR.If it has got 3 motors the main benefit is better handling by giving track mode 3 motors to play with,.. acceleration, steering and regen...
If there are 3 motors my hunch is they are all PMSR, and over heating is a total non-issue...
When the Roadster came out with 3 motors that is what I expect all higher performance track cars to have.
When Rivian and the Tesla semi came out with 4 motors that is what many work trucks or off road vehicles may eventually have.
A 3 motor Model X is a slight compromise....
1-2 motors is fine for regular driving, track and off-road are special cases...
I don't think this is an immediate concern as the reasons he started Tesla continue to exist. Towards the end of the Joe Rogan podcast you could hear is concern that the transition to solar/storage/ev was not happening fast enough.With respect to the "Tesla doom/bankcruptcy" angle I heard a new one recently: "Tesla isn't in this for the long term." The basis for this is Elon Musk's stated goal of acting as a catalyst to get the legacy automotive companies to start making EVs. So you shouldn't buy Tesla (I'm not sure if that was supposed to be the stock, the car, or both) because Elon isn't planning on his company staying around. Its the legacy makers that are here to stay, Tesla is just a flash in the pan.
Umm... Wow.
Nah, I don't think it would be 3 PMSR.
It would be either
1. Front Induction + Rear PMSR
or
2. Front PMSR + Rear Induction
Despite shorts been up in 2019 its often overlooked that they are down hysterically
Ihor Dusaniwsky on Twitter
Will a high performance S and X generate a lot of revenue for Tesla? Seems like a fairly niche market except for bragging rights.So spike up tomorrow again due to new Model S/X Plaid coming next year and delayed tariff news?
Model S/X are targeting different audience, audience that have $ to burn. Also this mean something "new" is coming instead of "no refresh"Will a high performance S and X generate a lot of revenue for Tesla? Seems like a fairly niche market except for bragging rights.
It sells the mission for sure, but not sure how it translates to TSLA share price.
When EM says," new chassis prototype", is he referring to a new Model S generation?
From peoples' comments, I guess most of you are all fine with Tesla apparently conceding "Taycan is a better track car than any Tesla you can get for the next year, and that's assuming that there's no schedule slips and no improvement by anyone else in the meantime". E.g., just abandoning the "we make the best EVs, period" halo effect. Also, apparently, fine with reinforcing the (false) notion that's already been hurting S and X sales, that the current (Raven) S and X are dated cars with overheating problems. Also no interest in doing anything to boost S and X sales in the near term so that they can add more shifts and get better utilization out of their existing capital investments.
Okay, so you're fine with that. I'm not. But the crowd has clearly spoken.
RBC Capital analyst Joseph Spak reiterated an Underperform rating and $190.00 price target on Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) after hosting an investor meeting with investor relations and taking a tour of Gigafactory 1 in Sparks, NV.
As with most IR meetings, this one seemed to offer no new meaningful financial information but the analyst stated "The tour gave us greater appreciation for the complexity and challenges involved in making the “guts” of an electric vehicle. Tesla stressed the improved efficiency from the depths of earlier production issues. For instance, they seemed particularly pleased with the new Grohmann pack assembly line. However, they have also gone to more manual labor on certain elements vs. initial automation plans. It does appear that further efficiency gains are still possible".
September 10, 2019 6:56 AM EDT