-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
humbaba
sleeping until $7000
Non-crash loss claims for fire. You may want this to mean the cars spontaneously combusted, but it only means what it means: that the cars were lost due to a non-collision fire. Hint: if your house burns down and your car was in the garage you might have a fire loss claim.
CNBC Phil Lebeau just now saying Wall Street number For Tesla to beat is 99,000 deliveries
Chickenlittle
Banned
Captkerosene
Member
Acid trip?
"The sooner these old white men are out of power, the better."
Moderator, your inaction has allowed this board to turn into a swamp where ageism, racism and sexism are tolerated.
"I refuse to answer on the grounds that you will almost certainly misquote me or take my words out of context."
Wall Street analyst consensus for Tesla’s deliveries in Q3
The Wall Street consensus for Tesla’s third-quarter deliveries is 98,000. Due to the July 1 reduction in the tax credit for Tesla vehicles, investors don’t have that incentive to bring forward their purchases to the third quarter. This could act as a negative catalyst for deliveries in Q3 compared to Q2.
"This Highway Loss Data Institute report presents comprehensive noncrash fire losses for passenger vehicles produced in model years 2016–18. Noncrash fire losses represent fire damage to a vehicle not caused by a collision or vandalism."
TheTalkingMule
Distributed Energy Enthusiast
Fact Checking
Well-Known Member
Wow, out of a hundred thousand or so smart summons made on the first weekend alone, not all of them went perfect, including a person who had another car drive into them), their owners shared videos or stills, and they went viral. Someone call the waaaaaambulance.
Am I the only person on this planet who cares about actual statistical incidence rates over anecdotes? It sometimes feels that way.
humbaba
sleeping until $7000
yes, safety is their top priority -- right after finding something to crucify Tesla with. I've lost track of the recent collision where they released a preliminary report stating they were going to use the event to strong arm Tesla and made a huge deal about the eight seconds (IIRC) lapse from when AP was engaged to collision -- when their own preliminary report included a screencap that showed the semi was screened by trees close up to the intersection and that the semi almost certainly had to have run the stop sign to get in front of the Tesla.
An accurate preliminary report would have noted that the incident appeared to be the fault of the semi driver, but that an investigation was being done for due diligence. And foregone the statement about going after Tesla.
I expect to hear nothing more about the accident unless they can craft a successful hit on Tesla. I was going to track it for the final report, but (as noted) I failed in that regard.
The NHTSA is approximately equal to the SEC in regards to Tesla. They haven't overstepped themselves yet and embarrassed themselves in court and I hope they keep it that way. But it is irritating how they keep gunning for Tesla.
You mean like areas that have atmosphere, or water?
Not to mention the total fallacy that we have to stop economic growth to clean up the planet. You might as well say "Let's stop collecting trash, saving that money will be more efficient."
humbaba
sleeping until $7000
You are not alone: insurance companies care very much. But the NHTSA has it out for Tesla. We both know which one makes headlines.
On the flip side of that...…...bears and shorts have a great opportunity to drive the price down on a macro bad day. It wouldn't take much for money for them to drop the price by 2-3%, yet it seems like they're too cautious of the numbers to do so.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
