I have bad news for you all. He’s is saying automation is taking jobs and shows a tesla turning itself. Not all publicity is good
Indeed, he appears to be a Luddite. Politicians often are. Nevertheless, I suspect that even this sort of publicity for Tesla is net beneficial.
). The sad fact of American politics is you either have to be a Luddite or fake it a little in order to get enough votes to win. 
Not exactly. Yang's thing is a universal income; basically a paycheck for not working to offset the unstoppable march of automation of certain jobs. He isn't so much advocating for stopping technological advance as trying to create a response to job loss due to it. No judgment intended here, just noting the luddite label doesn't fit.Indeed, he appears to be a Luddite. Politicians often are. Nevertheless, I suspect that even this sort of publicity for Tesla is net beneficial.
You really need to look at his positions. He DOES understand technology and automation and is not against it. He does want to both encourage it and tax it to pay for universal income. He is very much for Tesla.Indeed, he appears to be a Luddite. Politicians often are. Nevertheless, I suspect that even this sort of publicity for Tesla is net beneficial.
I would think for that to happen, the additional air to maintain positive pressure would still need to come from outside unless you have scuba tanks on board.
Indeed, he appears to be a Luddite. Politicians often are. Nevertheless, I suspect that even this sort of publicity for Tesla is net beneficial.
I completely agree that Tesla was in no danger of going belly up but I think the point he was making was, as someone mentioned, an overdramatization of the dire financial health and overall vulnerability the company was in at that point in time.
Yang is the candidate who tweeted that his running mate was cybertruck (after SNL made the joke first).Indeed, he appears to be a Luddite. Politicians often are. Nevertheless, I suspect that even this sort of publicity for Tesla is net beneficial.
