loved them back in ICE days
I can't wait to see this comment become mainstream
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
loved them back in ICE days
No. They have not. But it is obvious. That is the tech., that reduces costs radically. No paint shop, minimal body shop with no car specific tooling.
Pretty surprised at the lack of downward pressure from bears/shorts both today and on Friday. Would have been a good time to do a bear raid because volume on Friday and today has been lower than what the average has been for the past 1-2 months by quite a bit. Dare I say bears & shorts are too afraid of what's on that earnings call to initiate a bear raid???
I’ve never heard that term. What do they mean by it?
I think, that China is just being overly cautious and flexing their authoritarian power. This looks very scary to us in the west because we can't imagine a response like this.A couple of quick thoughts on macros / coronavirus. I am seeing some good news today: mainly, mild severity / lack of local transmission in countries where the virus has been imported; reports of a drop in persons within Wuhan presenting with fever at hospitals; estimations of lower reproduction numbers (~1.5-2.5) than previously estimated, and signs of symptoms presenting earlier than previously estimated (~5 days, as opposed to up to 14).
If (big if) the trend of good news holds through Thursday, the collective sigh of relief could be rocket fuel to a good earnings call for TSLA.
Or the shorts saving their powder and story for post ER (to help with some truck loading around here).
FYI, I'm only a bit skittish short-term because of what happened last year (and for mostly FUD reasons). I know it's different now with larger investors climbing in and word of mouth sales, but just be careful people. Taycan stories are mounting for one, so I can see someone planting a seed story of a low-cost version to start the Tesla chase (in people's minds, and some for-reals). I'm not a Porsche guy, but didn't they produce a 914 and the such? And then Rivian, with their sexy curve appeal, announcing their lower cost version.
On the other hand, if we hit 600 this week, I will have to bow and eat crow. My temptation to sell a bit as a hedge against any downward pressure would be tickled, but then I'd be daytrading. There is a small part of me that wants to try an option again, but avoiding them has been working out great so far.
And then Rivian, with their sexy curve appeal, announcing their lower cost version.
I also very much believe that Amazon will be sucking up most of Rivian's production for the foreseeable future.i just dont see how either Porsche or Rivian could possibly produce enough cars or get enough electric batteries to threaten Tesla, even if their products do (improbably) turn out to be comparable on price / range / technology, let alone do so profitably.
Do we have a pool regarding how much EPS winds up being?
Rivian didn't announce a different version of their truck, base model is still 105 kWh with ~230 miles of EPA range. What they announced is lower prices. But they didn't announce specific prices yet.
Rivian further said their previously announced base price of $69.9k is for a well equipped truck with the midsize pack of 135 kWh.
Coronavirus fears are bringing the whole market down.
I also very much believe that Amazon will be sucking up most of Rivian's production for the foreseeable future.
Yes but I don't see them having enough batteries to keep both running at full speed.The Amazon vehicle will be built on a seperate line than the passenger SUV-pickup truck and the 100k order will be delivered over ~5 years.
Yes but I don't see them having enough batteries to keep both running at full speed.
Agreed. Might not this increase higher margin S and X sales in China because of the superior air filtration system?
Jeff Bezos is RJ's muscle.I see Rivian giving a much firmer order than legacy OEMs which typically depend on their BEV demand.
I see Rivian signing deal stipulating they either buy the cells they promised to buy or they pay a penalty.
Meaning they actually get the cells they ordered.
BEVs aren't a side business for Rivian. They can't lean on ICEv sales.
Or it could be RJ Scaringe is an idiot.
I trust Jeff Bezos judgement that RJj Scaringe in not an idiot.
No, this is wrong. Vehicles go into inventory on the balance sheet when produced, which btw affects FCF, but not on the P&L Statement. When the vehicle is sold, then that asset is moved from the Balance sheet to P&L, with COGS (less labor which is a fixed expense) go to Expense and the sales becoming Revenue.
Given that Tesla made 21.8% gross margin on vehicles with an ASP around $53k, that's about $11.5 gross profit for every extra vehicle sold, regardless of when it was produced. Then given that Tesla sold 6,100 more vehicles than it produced in Q4, that's an est'd $70M in ADDITIONAL gross profit for 2019Q4 vs just selling the same no. of cars as they produced.
And since we know 2019Q3 was profitable while selling 15,000 fewer vehicles, we have a strong indication that MOST of that extra gross margin in Q4 will flow straight through to bottom line profits. I estimate the effect on profits to be +$172.5m from this alone.
Paging @The Accountant "Is this Accounting 101, or Accounting 301?"
Cheers!