Buckminster
Well-Known Member
That's immoral - think of the funds that could have bought those 10 shares if you hadn't been so greedy. Poor liquidity is on you now.In for another 10 during today's flash sale at $1575
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's immoral - think of the funds that could have bought those 10 shares if you hadn't been so greedy. Poor liquidity is on you now.In for another 10 during today's flash sale at $1575
Tesla could soon join the S&P 500 — but inclusion isn't automatic, even with a full year of profitability
The backroom dealers will do all in their power to try to slow this down.
If S&P doesn't add Tesla, then S&P might lag Tesla
My belief is that most of TSLA's $600 price appreciation since Q2 deliveries were announced is due to S&P 500 front-running. Everything else is in the noise.
If you really think Battery Day is creating multiple hundreds of dollars worth of TSLA share price, then you need to go back and see how Autonomy Day went for the stock. At best, Mr. Market's expectation is that Tesla can use the same million mile batteries that CATL will sell to other OEMs.
And I'm surprised I have to say this, but note that I'm expressing my opinion of the value, I'm expressing my opinion of Mr Market's opinion.
My belief is that most of TSLA's $600 price appreciation since Q2 deliveries were announced is due to S&P 500 front-running. Everything else is in the noise.
If you really think Battery Day is creating multiple hundreds of dollars worth of TSLA share price, then you need to go back and see how Autonomy Day went for the stock. At best, Mr. Market's expectation is that Tesla can use the same million mile batteries that CATL will sell to other OEMs.
And I'm surprised I have to say this, but note that I'm not expressing my opinion of the value, I'm expressing my opinion of Mr Market's opinion.
It really only takes one scenario. You undercut your competition to drive them out of business. Pretty simple really. Price has been one of the only legitimate reasons many people haven't seriously considered an EV.Really? How so?
Let’s take two scenarios
Yours:
1) Tesla grows at 50% / year while cutting prices 5% / year
2020: 500k vehicles.
2021: 750k vehicles
2022: 1.125M vehicles sold
2023: 1.7M
2024: 2.55M
Now all those additional vehicle sales in your scenario come from existing automakers. They are damaged on a 1 for 1 vehicle basis for each sale lost to Tesla.
Now let’s examine my scenario
Tesla grows at 50% / year keeping prices exactly the same:
2020: 500k vehicles.
2021: 750k vehicles
2022: 1.125M vehicles sold
2023: 1.7M
2024: 2.55M
‘Notice how the existing manufacturers lost the same exact number of sales whether Tesla cut prices or not?
I’m actually prepared mentally for the poo show
I still believe today is a head fake.
That's immoral - think of the funds that could have bought those 10 shares if you hadn't been so greedy. Poor liquidity is on you now.
I believe it is likely Battery Day will offer more digestible information for the market than Autonomy Day. That's assuming numbers are given for one or all of costs, production ramp, density, charging speed, etc. Autonomy Day was a waste of time IMO because the concepts were far too nebulous and incomprehensible.My belief is that most of TSLA's $600 price appreciation since Q2 deliveries were announced is due to S&P 500 front-running. Everything else is in the noise.
If you really think Battery Day is creating multiple hundreds of dollars worth of TSLA share price, then you need to go back and see how Autonomy Day went for the stock. At best, Mr. Market's expectation is that Tesla can use the same million mile batteries that CATL will sell to other OEMs.
And I'm surprised I have to say this, but note that I'm not expressing my opinion of the value, I'm expressing my opinion of Mr Market's opinion.
Tomorrow after the close. There's still another day of this before the report.When can we expect the letter?
Really? How so?
Let’s take two scenarios
Yours:
1) Tesla grows at 50% / year while cutting prices 5% / year
2020: 500k vehicles.
2021: 750k vehicles
2022: 1.125M vehicles sold
2023: 1.7M
2024: 2.55M
Now all those additional vehicle sales in your scenario come from existing automakers. They are damaged on a 1 for 1 vehicle basis for each sale lost to Tesla.
Now let’s examine my scenario
Tesla grows at 50% / year keeping prices exactly the same:
2020: 500k vehicles.
2021: 750k vehicles
2022: 1.125M vehicles sold
2023: 1.7M
2024: 2.55M
‘Notice how the existing manufacturers lost the same exact number of sales whether Tesla cut prices or not?
I think Tesla mentioned that providing insurance was to keep the other insurers honest. So the other auto insurers couldn't charge excessive rates with some excuse like "it's all brand new technology and, these newfangled electronic vehicle are more expensive to repair."True, I forgot that one, although the insurance side doesn't really seem to be much of a moneymaker for them. Maybe someone who's looked at the financial details can correct me, but Tesla seems to instead use their insurance advantage to lower rates in order to increase sales, not as a profit center.