You forgot deuterium and tritium...Light-weight hydrogen indeed! (I thought all hydrogen was light-weight).
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You forgot deuterium and tritium...Light-weight hydrogen indeed! (I thought all hydrogen was light-weight).
Soon one in every garage!
Not to mention some passive funds will likely grab a few million too.
Just looking back at yesterday's chart, that effort of the MM's to try for $1600 toward the end was for realz, but the recovery bounce was BAF and bodes well for Monday I feel.
View attachment 576516
Obviously a Nikola killer. The rendering quality and specs claims are much better.
I think that depends on the reason for getting FSD. For me it was because I'm afraid of falling asleep on a long trip. The price for FSD is a bargain compared to falling asleep and crashing. You'll have to decide based on your own experience.Weekend OT
Just convinced my better half that we should get a Model Y to hold us over until Cybertruck. We currently have just the 3 but need another especially as my wife wants to drive 500 miles rt on the weekends to run in the white mountains And be able to sleep in the vehicle. We were looking at Sprinter conversions but I couldn’t bring myself to pay that much money, or any, for ICE. Only question now is do I go for FSD as we’ll very likely sell it in 12-18 months for the tri-motor cyber.
This will impact the stock price $1x.00002..../5.
Also, while i too was against the buyout, having solar city publicly go bankrupt would give a lot of ammunition to the anti solar crowd and push back solar progress in the USA. Just think Solindra all over again But this time connected to Elon’s name. In the end , Elon did a good thing.On the surface, absolutely Tesla should have let Solar City go bankrupt (and they did pay "too much" for it).
But the world is never simple or neat and everything is connected. Going back to that time and place, Tesla was fragile and still had need for massive amounts of investor financing and growing companies need to constantly hire new talent. The loss of confidence in Elon and associated people that certainly would have happened had Solar City gone bankrupt would have certainly made it more difficult for Tesla to raise money and continue to attract top talent at a critical time in Tesla's history.
Elon understood this and took the safest most direct route to protect the things he had created and increase the success of the overall mission. It was not "by the book" or technically the "correct" thing to do, but this is what makes Elon such a valuable leader - he can pull off stunts that would cause others to crash and burn (whether they attempted the stunt or decided it was too improper). It's almost like he can see the future of every possible path he could take and is then able to chose the path with the most happy ending. It's an exceedingly rare quality and is the very definition of "vision". And Elon has it in spades.
We don't need to debate whether this was the technically "proper" thing to do, I'm willing to concede it was not - and we don't need to debate whether it was the best path either - the proof is in the pudding.
Guess those guys are basing the buys on their 'fiduciary responsibilities' to their clientsIndeed, I expect its those larger non-index funds doing much of the buying this week, although I don't think they're trying to front-run the index funds. I think mostly, they'll outperform the index funds as buy'n'hold investors (which is their selling point to clients)
Cheers!
You might have to wait till Post-split for thatWe saw a consolidation in the $1450 and now the split gave a new reason for a new rise.
Wondering if it will reach a new plateau in the $2000
Each stockholder of record on August 21, 2020 will receive a dividend of four additional shares of common stock for each then-held share, to be distributed after close of trading on August 28, 2020
So technically you could sell your share on Aug 22nd, get the current price for stock, and on the 28th you could get 4 shares (80%) back for free. Sucker who buys on 22nd pays full price and gets 20% (1/5th) the shares on the 28th ..
(Haven't heard mention of halted trading for this week?)
So in all week b/w 21st-28th will be interesting. If it was only split then the story would end there, but then we have S&P, battery day and Q3 to look forward to after the split that will add buying pressure, otherwise I think market shenanigans would pull down the SP ...
The tally on the 21 is just that, a tally. It doesn’t lock in place who get the new shares and who don’t. When you sell shares on the 25, you transfer your right to new shares as well.Each stockholder of record on August 21, 2020 will receive a dividend of four additional shares of common stock for each then-held share, to be distributed after close of trading on August 28, 2020
So technically you could sell your share on Aug 22nd, get the current price for stock, and on the 28th you could get 4 shares (80%) back for free. Sucker who buys on 22nd pays full price and gets 20% (1/5th) the shares on the 28th ..
(Haven't heard mention of halted trading for this week?)
So in all week b/w 21st-28th will be interesting. If it was only split then the story would end there, but then we have S&P, battery day and Q3 to look forward to after the split that will add buying pressure, otherwise I think market shenanigans would pull down the SP ...
You forgot deuterium and tritium...
It doesn't work that way. Buyers of stock between the 21st and the 28th get the other four shares from the seller because it doesn't start trading post-split until after the 28th. I know it sounds confusing but it works just how you think it should. No one gets free shares and no one gets less than they paid for.
The tally on the 21 is just that, a tally. It doesn’t lock in place who get the new shares and who don’t. When you sell shares on the 25, you transfer your right to new shares as well.
I agree. SolarCity bankruptcy would have been terrible for both team Elon and team climate change. Elon is such a massive value add to the company and to the mission that, even when we don't agree with the decision, it is worth holding our noses and going with it.Also, while i too was against the buyout, having solar city publicly go bankrupt would give a lot of ammunition to the anti solar crowd and push back solar progress in the USA. Just think Solindra all over again But this time connected to Elon’s name. In the end , Elon did a good thing.
As a shareholder I lost a little money due to the merger, and it makes me cry.
Animated GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY
I agree. SolarCity bankruptcy would have been terrible for both team Elon and team climate change. Elon is such a massive value add to the company and to the mission that, even when we don't agree with the decision, it is worth holding our noses and going with it.
Thanks.
So no trading b/w 21st - 28th?
For Cash Dividends, the Person on record date gets the dividend and after that he can sell the next day and still get the dividend.
So there must be a rule that if you b/w 21st-28th, you also forfeit your dividend shares?
I'm not sure how you derived that from my comments.
And that is why this is a stock split and not a dividend in the conventional sense of the word. The stock will trade at the normal pre-split price through the 28th.