JusRelax
Active Member
"For Tesla, the Clock Is Ticking"...
hmmm.. I feel like if you put any other auto manufacturer's name in there, and the headline makes more sense.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Further, the use of non-Supercharger locations means that battery pre-charge conditioning did not occur, thus reducing max charge rate.Only thing that bugs me about that article is the comparison of charge rates in terms of "How much SoC you get per minute charging" rather than "How much range you get per minute charging". The former is an utterly meaningless figure.
Just don't link it to their website directly (you can break the URL by inserting a space). You linking to it because of their yellow journalism is the reason why they do yellow journalism (people link to their website which increase their ranking in search engines). Let's be smart and not encourage their toxic behavior.CNBC warning!!
German auto supplier Eisenmann files for insolvency
So despite Eisenmann being a general auto supplier, it's negative, so the only manufacturer they choose to mention in the article is, dah dah!
FRANKFURT, July 30 (Reuters) - German auto supplier Eisenmann, which supplied Tesla in 2015 with a new paint shop at its Freemont plant in California, filed for insolvency late on Monday, in a sign of the growing economic problems crushing profits in the auto sector.
Eisenmann, which has 3,000 employees and generated annual revenues of 723 million euros ($806 million) in 2017, filed for insolvency at the Stuttgart District Court.
Djeezes, these discussions about Elon's tweets and the SEC... Feels like summer 2018 again
It's like we're stuck in a loop were bulls and bears repeat every argument again.
I person once told me that the answer to any question you never ask is "no". So at least you have a chance of making some non-zero impact.Spent an hour this weekend to tweet all Republican senators, asking them how it is possible that the US government is subsidizing German, Korean and Chinese EVs, while at the same time limiting or ending the subsidy for US made EVs (Tesla, GM). A bit like the Chinese, who only subsidize Chinese EVs, but then the exact opposite. Probably a waste of time, but maybe I planted a seed somewhere...
...
Kind of like saying "I have a non-profit organization, it wasn't planned that way - it just happened."?
Other companies have been doing container packs for a while. I'm surprised it took Tesla this long.
Looks like the new short "concern" is that Tesla is not spending on Capex as much as the depreciation. It is a really bad argument.View attachment 435677
"For Tesla, the Clock Is Ticking"...
hmmm.. I feel like if you put any other auto manufacturer's name in there, and the headline makes more sense.
Looks like the new short "concern" is that Tesla is not spending on Capex as much as the depreciation. It is a really bad argument.
The Model 3 line is brand new - you don't expect them to spend 100s of millions to "maintain" it. Just as you don't spend a lot of money maintaining a brand new car, even though it depreciates fast in the first 2 years. Tesla infact is young enough a company that most of their capex is for growth, rather than maintenance.
With other auto companies - they have regular model year changes as well as new generation of every car once in 7 or so years. That is what those companies spend money on. They are basically in steady state (or declining).
The expectations were that Tesla would have to spend a lot for GF3 and Model Y ramp, it hasn't been the case ...
Looks like you were right and I was wrong. I predicted $250 by the end of today.Based on how fast it rebounded last month I would think investors are going to let it reach a point they like then pounce. Likely will see $220 as that point. I think it gets pushed down for a few days though
Big Picture questions:GF3 has already made its tooling purchases, so it demonstrably didn't cost Tesla much capex.
As for Y, in Q2 they were making room at Fremont for the line, so they demonstrably couldn't have been tooling then.
GE, Kokam, Johnson Controls, Saft, Exide, Hitachi, AES, Schmid and a half million others. A better question might be who isn't?Who?
Hopefully like the shorts you do all your analysis on the toilet.Looking at the after-hours chart before the market opened, and was like HOLY MOLY the shorts are running with the solar roof tweet.
Then, I realized I was looking at BYND by mistake.
TL;DR - so bullish, mistaking the BYND chart for TSLA only made me pee a little.