There is room for at least 6.... Why not?Can I join?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is room for at least 6.... Why not?Can I join?
The initial gut reaction on any new design is always Yuuck. It takes a few minutes, hours, days, longer to get to liking it.No matter what, Cybertruck is going to turn off a lot of people.
What we really care about is how many people it Turns ON.
Also something to keep in mind is few people have seen it in person, ridden inside, etc.
I was on the turned off, 50/50 side and became a convert over the course of a few hours.
Having had the driver's window shatter from road debris thrown up from a vehicle going the opposite way, I wouldn't call it a "nothing-burger" . I would say it's not that common, but it's rather annoying when you get showered with glass cubes while driving.The windows breaking from a giant steel ball being thrown at them. Why do so many people care about this? It’s baffling to me. It was a funny moment, but how many people were expecting a truck with unbreakable glass? This trucks not for me, the glass breaks too easily. It’s just a big nothing burger. And I’m pretty sure that’s the first time I’ve ever used the phrase “nothing burger”.
Sounds like a megacharger semi recharge depo.Also, a large charging station is being built in Hampton Roads, Virginia. Not for use by customers. I feel that the new Tesla is going to be built in Hurt, Virginia. Hurt is only a 3 !/2 hour train ride from Hampton Roads and I feel that this Tesla station is to charge the new TESLA cars or trucks and will be charged before being loaded onto ships. Have been studying on this for a long time.....Does anyone know if I am correct?
So now that we had the chance to sleep once after the reveal of the amazing Tesla stainless steel Cybertruck, here are my thoughts about the economics of the mass manufacturing of stainless steel cars and its implications for the car industry.
I believe Tesla's design is even more advantageous than I initially thought - Tesla achieved a significant manufacturing break-through here - as described in more detail below.
Firstly, a bit of historic background. Somewhat ironically, carmakers have experimented with stainless steel designs as early as 1936, when Ford built six stainless steel sedans for the Ludlum Steel Co. to promote using their product.
This is how well they held up after almost 100 years:
But carmakers had many, many good economic reasons why they didn't make stainless steel cars in volume:
And here comes Tesla and turns all of these economic factors upside down with their first-principles stainless steel car design break-through:
- Much more expensive tooling:
- Stainless steel is just too hard, and even the latest high-tech press-die alloys don't allow more than just a couple of ten thousand runs - i.e. amortization of these long lead time tooling items is incredibly high because dies that are durable enough to stamp hundreds of thousands of panels before wearing down are incredibly difficult to design and manufacture. I.e. the best, most important property of high precision stamping dies (durability) increases their cost and their lead time significantly.
- Stainless steel is not malleable enough and the press springs back hard which wears down other parts of the press as well IIRC. I believe @Krugerrand wrote about this a year ago or so? (@ReflexFunds might have mentioned it too.)
- Welding of stainless steel is rather difficult - there's contractors out there who do nothing but install and weld stainless steel as a specialty.
- Planned obsolescence: this was one of the major reasons given in a short article about stainless steel cars: they last too damn long and a major source of revenue for established carmakers is from maintenance of the fleet, much of which is out of warranty.
- Mass and efficiency disadvantages: stainless steel body panels are not structural, most of them are not load-bearing, so the extra weight and drop in fuel efficiency is significant.
There's also a couple of unique advantages to stainless steel, which were mentioned here before, but which I believe are important to sum up to get a complete picture about the mass manufacturing economics:
- Much less expensive tooling and assembly:
- The folded-stainless-steel design requires no stamping.
- This also reduces tooling lead time significantly. Note how Tesla has announced to make it in 2021 already - basically 1.5 years from now. This is incredibly fast for a new product that changes basically everything about how cars are made, and future iterations will be even faster.
- Folded stainless steel doesn't have to be welded.
- Making durable cars is actually an advantage for an upstart carmaker like Tesla, whose average fleet age is less than 3 years - even if we ignore the whole benevolent 'save the planet' part of Tesla's mission.
- Vehicle mass and fuel/energy efficiency advantages: the "exoskeleton" design is load bearing, so the stainless steel has a triple role as a frame, skin and crash protection. The inherent weight disadvantages of stainless steel turn into weight advantages. That's I think a big part of how the Tesla Cybertruck will be able to reach 500 miles range - not just battery chemistry and pack manufacturing advances. Low mass also allows sports car properties ...
- No paint required: No chemical bath to de-grease and clean the body before painting. No robots to spray several layers of paint. No ovens to dry the paint. No paint chemistry risk - which is still a source of expensive recalls even for much older carmakers.
- Corrosion resistance: corrosion of the car under-body, frame and chassis has been a bane of the automotive industry with expensive recalls, significant warranty risks and a longer design and testing cycle. Stainless steel is one of the most corrosion resistant materials, it is used all around in public transportation and construction with a ~100 years track record of the durability of the various stainless steel alloys.
- Stainless steel is significantly more fatigue resistant than the current material of choice of carmakers: aluminum. Stainless steel has 5-10 times the fatigue strength of aluminum, and within its (generous) plastic deformation constraints stainless steel has an infinite fatigue life:
I'm sure with time we will find some disadvantages of stainless steel - such as lower scratch resistance unless made really hard with chromium - but those are solvable IMHO and all the advantages are stacked up a mile high already...
The beauty of Tesla's design: I believe other carmakers will have no choice but to embrace the stainless steel design.
On a final note, Elon disguised the true motivation for the Cybertruck masterfully, without warning the competition prematurely: what everyone thought to be a childhood dream and a personal folly of Elon (Blade Runner truck), was in fact dictated by the economics of this radically new stainless steel based vehicle mass manufacturing paradigm.
All I can say after ~30 hours with this new car - all current "trucks" look like clay flower pots. Old, fragile and boring.
This cybertruck has been the change of world trends that has not happened for a loooong time, or ever.
Good night to you all.
And the vast majority still won't be buying $40k plus pickups.
Sorry if this has already been discussed, it's been hard to keep up with this thread recently. Some people are raising concerns about the safety aspects of the Cybertruck and how economical any repairs would be. With the panels being very costly and difficult to replace (insurance cost concerns) and a lack of crumple zones. The vehicle perhaps being too damaging to others in a crash? Any thoughts on this?
Hummer was a Bummer,And the vast majority still won't be buying $40k plus pickups.
Of course the “majority” won’t be buying it. Any company would kill to have this kind of interest from “possible” future consumers. Why you downplay it so much is baffling.
If aesthetic was the only motivation then yes it would take decades or even infinite time to convert a majority. But take into account economics, specs, savings, performance... and I would’t be surprised by a quite fast (<decade) conversion. It also leaves a lot of space for incumbent to fill so they can stay relevant.This is serious crack pipe smoking.
It takes a long time to change minds this drastically in terms of aesthetics.
If it does happen it will take a lot longer than 4 years.
This is the equivalent of saying in 4 years the blue business suit will be on the way out in favor of silver sci fi suits.
Maximize insolation by having Smart Summon park the car in different positions to keep the sun at optimum angle throughout the day! /s
Ho, you're way out over your skis here. The truck bed is 2.8 sq. m in area. Assume 20% panel efficiency and 5 hrs/day insolation @ 1 kw/sq.m.
That's just 2.8 KWh per day. Pick any other values you want, just state your assumptions and show your math.
How do you get bty size out of that? You can't. As long as the pack is physically capable of storing the amount of energy captured in a single day, solar power rating tells you nothing about the vehicle's energy storage capacity.
Now if Elon had said it takes 35 days to fully charge the SR pack, we'd have the straw we need to make our bricks. That'd make it a 100 kwh bty pack. But as is, the revealed specs tell us nothing about the size of the bty. We can only estimate the avg daily charging rate, and even that given some assumptions.
I don't think it much matters what the final number is
$100 refundable deposit is not a serious commitment to buy.
In 2010 Nissan LEAF looked like a world beater with $99 deposits.