Alphacrux
Member
Gonna say nope.
They compare their performance to a permanent magnet motor. The Tesla model 3 style is beyond that. Tesla efficiency is already over 90%, the claimed 10% range increase would put them at 99%. (Actually not, since this does not impact the rest of the losses in the vehicle, so even going from 90 to 100% motor efficiency would not get you 10% more range).
Roadster is trimotor, not quad.
More torque at low speed is a matter of stator winding count, and trades off back EMF at higher speeds. Which they address by adding mechanical induced field weakening.
What is the cooling system for the enclosed stator?
Tesla does not use or need a boost converter stage to drive their motor. The high voltage pack only needs a buck converter stage to drive the motor. (Which also acts as a boost stage in regen)
I won't deny that you may be right. However, on the Roadster page on Tesla's website, I could not see any reference to 'tri-motor' design. I would maintain that since it is not listed and it is still a prototype, that the number of motors may be subject to change.
The only other thing I would argue is that the claimed range increase of 10% might be against other electric motors, not Tesla's. Maybe the increase of efficiency from a Tesla motor to theirs is probably less than 10%.
Still worth watching this technology.