He doesn't seem sufficiently enthusiastic about an electric bike. I do think it could be good for the brand to do so. That is, it is important for Tesla to have a more comprehensive approach to sustainable transport. That vision should be inclusive of bicycles, scooters and other personal mobility concepts. Having an comprehensive vision, however, does not mean that Tesla must manufacture it. For the moment there seems to be an abundance of scooters and ebikes on the market. Though, I do think there is plenty of room for innovation, particularly around cool personal mobility that is stable and safe.
The huge areas for improvement, IMO, are in motor efficiency, gearing, and cost.
Battery density is decent (my e-bike, for instance, is using Samsung INR18650-35E cells, which have similar density to Tesla's current cells), but it's about $800 at retail for a 500 Wh pack, that has 40 cells in it.
As far as motors go, though... ugh.
Low-end e-bikes and many DIY e-bikes use hub motors, and these are almost universally surface permanent magnet (and many have thick laminations). This means there's no reluctance torque, so cogging losses when coasting are high, and they don't respond to field weakening very well at all, so hub motors are actually wound to hit the RPM defined by their Kv constant at the expected top speed of the bicycle, greatly reducing low-end torque (whereas the motors in Tesla's cars respond quite well to field weakening, to the point that they hit their Kv constant-based maximum RPM and introduce field weakening at about 2/5 of their peak RPM, IIRC). Additionally, if gear reduction is used, hub motor manufacturers almost invariably include a freewheel to prevent the cogging losses from being an issue when coasting or pedaling without assistance, but this prevents regenerative braking.
Higher-end e-bikes, and a couple of DIY retrofit kits, use mid-drive motors, that mount where the bottom bracket on a conventional bicycle goes. This improves weight distribution for mountain bikes, and the mid-drives tend to have better magnetic configurations (including ones that can actually generate decent amounts of reluctance torque, and respond well to field weakening)... but there's usually a couple freewheels in the mid-drive unit itself (to prevent the pedals from either driving the motor (and causing losses there), or being driven by the motor (which would be dangerous)), and then everything goes through the bicycle's gearing which has another freewheel. Drivetrain losses can end up higher, and regen is impossible here.
There's a lot of room for Tesla to make a good geared hub motor with efficient gear reduction, no freewheel, excellent magnetic configuration, and a good controller.
Also worth noting that what's happening in the e-bike space is, for higher-end stuff, people seem to select the electric drive system they want, and then select a bike that has it. (I went the other way around, selecting a style of bike, realizing that there was one manufacturer at my local dealer that did it well, and then riding two models with different systems. ...but the Bosch system being better was a deciding factor in which bike I bought.) This may mean there's room for Tesla to enter the market as a supplier, instead of as a bicycle manufacturer - but would Tesla want to give up that much control?
And then, for gearing... your choices right now basically boil down to, derailleur gearing (simple, lightweight, cheap, efficient, but fully exposed to the elements, finicky if done wrong, and can't be shifted at a stop), hub gears (heavier, more expensive, many can't be shifted under load, usually less efficient than derailleurs, and usually incompatible with rear hub motors (except for one 5-speed hub gear and one hub motor designed around that 5-speed hub) but can be shifted at a stop, and fully protected from the elements), and the Enviolo CVP (all of the downsides of hub gears, absolutely hideous efficiency, and doesn't like to be shifted at a stop either, but it's a CVT). A couple companies have been working on power split devices for e-bikes, it'll be interesting to see how those go... but damn good motor/generators and power electronics are needed to pull that off with any kind of efficiency (after all, at 90% efficiency for both motor/generator systems, that means 81% system efficiency for the serial path, lower than an Enviolo CVP - you need at least 92% efficiency for both motor/generators to beat Enviolo's efficiency on the serial path).
So, yeah, there's a lot of room for improvement, and that could be a market that Tesla could break into and generate goodwill among urbanists that currently see Tesla as part of the problem because their transportation solutions are all cars currently.
You have a Governor washed his hand and ignore federal defined CISA.
CISA declares almost everything as critical infrastructure, though. It wasn't intended to deal with pandemics, it was intended to deal with terrorist attacks, where the threat model is completely different.
If you follow CISA's critical infrastructure definitions to the letter, GameStop is critical infrastructure. Casinos are critical infrastructure. Sporting events are critical infrastructure.
