Interesting Pierre Ferragu tweets. I like where he's heading:
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Plaid vs Lucid Air:
A correction of 25% in growth stocks is probably pricing 2 hikes of 0.25? I thought the discount rate made growth stock drop around 8% for every 0.25 increase?There are two ways to read our current macro situation, in my opinion:
I think we're in scenario two, and have placed my bets accordingly.
- Status Quo is Not Priced In / Market Holding its Breath for a U-Turn: Essentially, the market has not fully priced in a March rate increase, quantitative tightening beginning as early as June, and 3 rate hikes this year, and is only where it is because investors are holding out hope for a U-turn from the Fed tomorrow, backing off of the March rate increase. If we don't get that (which is extremely unlikely!), we head lower and are in a bear market for the next 3-6 months. This is the view espoused by Kevin Paffrath on Dave Lee's podcast the other day, and why he liquidated his portfolio.
- Status Quo is Priced In / Market Worried About "Shock and Awe": In this scenario, the market has priced in 3 rate hikes of .25 basis points and quantitative tightening beginning mid-to-later this year, and has dropped to where it has now because of concern with the possibility of an even more hawkish Fed that will give us more and/or bigger rate increases than already anticipated, and possibly quantitative tightening as soon as March. If the Fed stays the course and does not announce a more hawkish roadmap than what we've already been lead to anticipate, we'll get a relief rally as those fears dissipate.
Troy EPS is $2.84 (non gaap)
Biden to meet with CEOs to discuss Build Back Better agenda
President Biden is set to meet with several corporate executives on Wednesday at the White House to discuss his Build Back Better proposal, a White House official told The Hill on Tuesday.&nbs…thehill.com
(not trying to make any political stmt)
Aww, they are getting together to listen to the Tesla Earnings Report together.
I hope they all bring their anti-depressants.
You really suggesting Biden should invite Elon to a big PR show about a bill Elon very publicly said shouldn’t happen? Nah. Even putting aside the fact Tesla is pretty much the only EV game in town that counts.
Biden to meet with CEOs to discuss Build Back Better agenda
President Biden is set to meet with several corporate executives on Wednesday at the White House to discuss his Build Back Better proposal, a White House official told The Hill on Tuesday.&nbs…thehill.com
(not trying to make any political stmt)
5Tw of energy by 2030? That's way beyond Tesla's guidance.Interesting Pierre Ferragu tweets. I like where he's heading:
5Tw of energy by 2030? That's way beyond Tesla's guidance.
Need to appease the 10x or bust WSB degenerates.I think he started with $10T and worked backwards until the numbers worked
I'm not gonna quibble with the top line figure for automotive, tho I think it's a bit high. My problem is with people who base a $10T valuation primarily on making cars.Interesting Pierre Ferragu tweets. I like where he's heading:
Of all the brands to put in there. I mean the think looks like a Buick, so that would have been more appropriate.“2022 Lada Air Dream”
JPOW could crush us all tmrw, we will see. Im gonna wear my lucky socks
If energy is as large as automotive and automotive is 20MM * 40k ASP (lump FSD) = $800B , Megapack is $1MM for 3MWh in single units today, call it $0.5MM for 3MWh in 2030 at volume.5Tw of energy by 2030? That's way beyond Tesla's guidance.
Elon Musk -- Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. I can't emphasize. I think long term, Tesla Energy will be roughly the same size as Tesla Automotive. So I mean, the energy business collectively is bigger than the automotive business.
So you feel like how big is the energy sector? Bigger than automotive. And in order to achieve a sustainable energy future, we have to have sustainable energy generation, which I think is going to be primarily solar and followed by wind, and those are intermittent. So you need to have a lot of batteries to store the solar energy because the wind doesn't always blow, and the sun doesn't always shine. So there's like three elements of the sustainable energy future: wind and solar sustainable energy generation; battery storage; and electric transport, those three things.
And the mission of Tesla is to accelerate sustainable energy, so I can't emphasize enough. Yes, the battery and solar will both be enormous, and they kind of have to be in order to -- for us to have a sustainable future. And we've got a great product road map on that front as well. So we're going to ship in the Megapack.
I wonder what the specific guidance for energy is?5Tw of energy by 2030? That's way beyond Tesla's guidance.
Are they? Where are you getting that information? I thought they were still all 2170 based, mainly from LG/Samsung.Tesla is already using CATL LFP for energy storage
Are they? Where are you getting that information? I thought they were still all 2170 based, mainly from LG/Samsung.
I'm also assuming this unofficial source is legit. It makes perfect sense to me, if Tesla are doing this, it is a logical and excellent idea.Even though MP2-XL will have a much larger footprint and offer more storage, our source says it will actually be cheaper to produce than the current MP1 system thanks to the use of CATL Prismatic LFP cells.