Maybe he is following a Fibonacci Sequence, in which case the next number will be 8
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
Or maybe no thought has gone into the amount of bots presented beyond how many bots they had presentable at the time they shot the video. Crazy thought, I know.
Phosphate discovery in Norway could power electric cars for next 50 years
A huge phosphate rock deposit found in Norway is thought to be the world's largest - the mineral is used for electric car batteries, solar panels and more.www.bbc.co.uk
^Great news for human life sustainability. I don't know how truly important this is for EV's, since I assume we have several battery chemistries to choose from in case of shortages, but this is absolutely massive for agriculture. My horticulture professor talked about phosphate shortage dangers decades ago already - to have this massive deposit turn up in Norway, a stable country, is a good thing for all of us.
Between Norway's phosphate, Kazakhstan's potassium, and Peru's guano, we may not have to rely on Martian poo potatoes for sustenance after all!
As shown by @hobbes, Europe has consistently grown, basically Q2 is on par with the great Q1.
I noticed that the "Other" segment has grown too: at 8506 for the quarter, it is the 4th "country" in Europe.
This suggests other markets are picking up the pace, and that we'll need a longer table ;-)
Source:
teslamotorsclub.com
I noticed that the "Other" segment has grown too: at 8506 for the quarter, it is the 4th "country" in Europe.
This suggests other markets are picking up the pace, and that we'll need a longer table ;-)
Source:
Wiki - Tesla Europe Registration Stats
This wiki belongs to the thread EU Market situation and outlook. Click HERE (CTRL-click to open in new tab) to add new data using a Google form. Any forum member can contribute. We encourage you to do so! Your entry will appear after the data is double-checked by other volunteers. If the data...
teslamotorsclub.com
The 2023 World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai is ongoing:
Buckle up for an extraordinary showcase of innovation at the 2023 World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai@ShLetsMeet#WAIC #ArtificialIntelligence
Twitter user zhongwen2005 had some tweets from there:
2023 World Artificial Intelligence Conference, #Tesla founder and CEO Elon Musk said full self-driving will come at the end of this year
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, full autopilot will be achieved around the end of this year. "I've made many similar predictions before, and I admit the previous ones weren't entirely accurate, but this one, I think, is relatively close." #tesla
#Tesla Musk: Tesla humanoid robot still in development stage
#Tesla CEO Elon Musk: Tesla is willing to share self-driving technology with automakers.
Buckle up for an extraordinary showcase of innovation at the 2023 World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai@ShLetsMeet#WAIC #ArtificialIntelligence
Twitter user zhongwen2005 had some tweets from there:
2023 World Artificial Intelligence Conference, #Tesla founder and CEO Elon Musk said full self-driving will come at the end of this year
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, full autopilot will be achieved around the end of this year. "I've made many similar predictions before, and I admit the previous ones weren't entirely accurate, but this one, I think, is relatively close." #tesla
#Tesla Musk: Tesla humanoid robot still in development stage
#Tesla CEO Elon Musk: Tesla is willing to share self-driving technology with automakers.
Cult Member
Born on the 4th of July
Who will be first to announce the adaptation of FSD? What's your guess?
Perhaps Mary this time?
As this is a strategic move for a company it's hard to guess.
The first may be one that was first with adopting SC.. or the one who was last adopting SC and now wants to gain on the others?
Competitors have a big problem of a fleet that is incapable of FSD, only their new cars could become FSD-capable.
After a major internal redesign.... OTA is a necessity for FSD. Internal highbandwidht network is a necessity for OTA. Internal HBN is useless without consolidated car SW and controlers that speak same language. Controllers and SW that can speak to eachother need consolidated supplier network (or better yet - its own SW and mikroprocs). ETC...
After thinking a bit about this ... forget about it, it ain't gonna happen.
At best some company may reach a deal with tesla to start building model 3 the same way tesla does, using same suppliers as tesla does (and buying components from Tesla). Such a model results in a non-tesla Model 3 that is more expensive than Tesla Model 3.
Elon is just playing a nice guy... it's not his fault nobody else can implement tesla's FSD on their cars.
jkirkwood001
Active Member
Wow, I can't believe this is still going on.
Can't we just agree that investing IS a zero-sum in terms of the number of shares (excluding splits and new issues), but it is NOT a zero-sum in terms of the dollars going in or out of Tesla?
I think most of this is arguing about symantics. Please stop!
dgodfrey
Member
Think about how close we came though to suffering with an inarguably inferior product. I'm not prone to swallowing conspiracy theories but for the past 10 years, it was extremely frustrating to listen to the vocal minority of CCS owners predicting the demise of the SpC Network. Every argument they could think of had no basis in fact yet they were convinced that the NACS was toast. There are still members of non-Tesla forums that are bitter over this transition and have vowed to never give Musk a dime. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.
And even though there is not a single argument or metric that CCS holds an advantage over NACS, it was purely the incompetence of the public charging infrastructures major players that got us here. They incorrectly assumed that CCS was "the" standard and competing with NACS in any way was unnecessary.
It has restored my faith in that given a fair fight, the superior product can win. This wasn't a fair fight and it was almost a technicality that the better standard won. Truly a David vs. Goliath moment.
Agreement of manufacturers in China (including Tesla) on pricing:
teslamag-de.translate.goog
Preis-Frieden in China: Tesla und 15 weitere Elektroauto-Hersteller mit Fairness-Abkommen
Der Preiskampf bei Elektroautos in China könnte enden: Tesla und 15 weitere Hersteller haben ein Abkommen für fairen Wettbewerb unterschrieben
teslamag-de.translate.goog
Elon actually says "Level 4 or 5"...
"I´ve been wrong about this in the past BUT..."
My gut feeling is either Ford or Rivian are the most likely to adopt Tesla FSD first. Once it starts though I think it will go much like NACS has, the first domino will start a tidal wave of adopters.
Cult Member
Born on the 4th of July
In regard of the external hardware adaptation Tesla already demonstrated that they could cover different models simultaneously. And I'm pretty sure they haven't had today's software architecture in mind as they delivered the first Model 3 in 2018. The internal FSD hardware, call it the brain, has to be part of the deal and includes the OTA interface. The other part for steering and driving will use a common API.
Sell everything as a black box, that's what today's OEM know and understand and give it a fancy name without your brand in it like:
Worldwide Human Automatic Transport, or short
WHAT
/s
navguy12
Active Member
So VW wants to add a bunch of combustion models in China by 2030 according to the article.Agreement of manufacturers in China (including Tesla) on pricing:
Preis-Frieden in China: Tesla und 15 weitere Elektroauto-Hersteller mit Fairness-Abkommen
Der Preiskampf bei Elektroautos in China könnte enden: Tesla und 15 weitere Hersteller haben ein Abkommen für fairen Wettbewerb unterschrieben
Yeah, 17 new models until 2030 - need a "sad" rating. With Diess in charge I still had a bit of hope...
robertvg
Extremely Well-Known Member
The advantage of CCS1 and CCS2 is that AC and DC are separated so you do not need to build in switch equipment in the car to direct the current either to the battery or to the onboard rectifiers. The early Model S and X had an HVDC switchbox for this (underneath the backseat) which costed apparently ~500USD. I don't know how they solved it in the Model 3 and Y.
Afaik this was the reason for OEM's supporting the CCS model years ago: cost savings on the car side.
Sure. Done.
Next discussion: How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
That's incorrect.
NACS: port leads go to charger
Pack leads go to charger
Contactors bypass charger
CCS:
Port AC leads go to charger
Port DC leads go to contactor
Contactor and charger go to pack
The advantage of CCS is that it didn't impact existing AC only cars (pins were undersized for DC fast charging) and the charger input doesn't need to withstand full pack voltage.
IMHO, the CHadeMO and CCS1 forums must be nice this time of day; I bet all the posts about that would probably be happier together there.
I hear there's supposed to be a nice Zero Sum forum somewhere too, isn't there??
I hear there's supposed to be a nice Zero Sum forum somewhere too, isn't there??
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
