I've felt like @Drumheller for awhile now as well, but it's not just being patient, it's making sure you stay healthy because we've got at least 7+ more years to see the growth and where the value should be...
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
GhostSkater
Member
Hey that's my post
To further elaborate, AV companies have to report how often they disengage their vehicles, but they don't have to report how often a remote operator takes over control, or gives some input to the vehicle. I've been ranting on Spaces about how this is ridiculous and I guaranteed they were having much higher incident rates when considering remote interventions.
According to this (paywalled) NYTimes article, some employees are claiming it's once very 5 miles
.I actually cannot believe it's even this bad, that must be an exaggeration. But the point remains - these AV companies are grossly exaggerating their capabilities to "fake it till they make it" and suck on that sweet, sweet, investor funding so they don't go bankrupt. They cannot be trusted.
The emporer has no clothes.
Meanwhile Tesla FSD is walking around with a big
that's still learning to control itself, but no faking.
Yup. I expressed very similar thoughts around 2019 on this forum. Glad I stayed with TSLA and Tesla!!
Last edited:
Dikkie Dik
If gets hard, use hammer
Usually a reliable source and as expected; Giga Berlin will build the 25K Tesla
Imagine how much that cost GM having (allegedly) 1.5 remote operators per Cruise vehicle! My guess is the rumor is outdated/inflated due to the insane costs implied, but not eliminated.Hey that's my post
To further elaborate, AV companies have to report how often they disengage their vehicles, but they don't have to report how often a remote operator takes over control, or gives some input to the vehicle. I've been ranting on Spaces about how this is ridiculous and I guaranteed they were having much higher incident rates when considering remote interventions.
According to this (paywalled) NYTimes article, some employees are claiming it's once very 5 miles
I actually cannot believe it's even this bad, that must be an exaggeration. But the point remains - these AV companies are grossly exaggerating their capabilities to "fake it till they make it" and suck on that sweet, sweet, investor funding so they don't go bankrupt. They cannot be trusted.
The emporer has no clothes.
Meanwhile Tesla FSD is walking around with a big
I'm now 99% certain that a Waymo U-turn yesterday was remote controlled. My wife said it was smooth and creepy. Heck, they are challenged by left turns it seems. Pretty fishy.
Trying to get AI to answer the question, this is the best it could do, but they're talking 3-point turns back in 2021.
Any Remote operators still? I can't even confirm that part. Top secret stuff!
Hey that's my post
To further elaborate, AV companies have to report how often they disengage their vehicles, but they don't have to report how often a remote operator takes over control, or gives some input to the vehicle. I've been ranting on Spaces about how this is ridiculous and I guaranteed they were having much higher incident rates when considering remote interventions.
According to this (paywalled) NYTimes article, some employees are claiming it's once very 5 miles
I actually cannot believe it's even this bad, that must be an exaggeration. But the point remains - these AV companies are grossly exaggerating their capabilities to "fake it till they make it" and suck on that sweet, sweet, investor funding so they don't go bankrupt. They cannot be trusted.
The emporer has no clothes.
Meanwhile Tesla FSD is walking around with a big
On the other hand, they are getting useful training data every 5 miles. That should make their project a lot more valuable given how few vehicles they have...
Captkerosene
Member
I've made a lot of money from short sellers. Wish there were more ... I'm kinda starting to like 'em.
Honestly, I thought you were a short seller
jkirkwood001
Active Member
Hey, let's extrapolate! Think of the potential!?! If we added WAY more people, we could have a whole town of tens of thousands of handsomely-paid staff reproducing the work of DOJO, one AI supercomputer!! Huge breakthrough!!!!Hey that's my post
To further elaborate, AV companies have to report how often they disengage their vehicles, but they don't have to report how often a remote operator takes over control, or gives some input to the vehicle. I've been ranting on Spaces about how this is ridiculous and I guaranteed they were having much higher incident rates when considering remote interventions.
According to this (paywalled) NYTimes article, some employees are claiming it's once very 5 miles
I actually cannot believe it's even this bad, that must be an exaggeration. But the point remains - these AV companies are grossly exaggerating their capabilities to "fake it till they make it" and suck on that sweet, sweet, investor funding so they don't go bankrupt. They cannot be trusted.
The emporer has no clothes.
Meanwhile Tesla FSD is walking around with a big
Oh wait a minute... $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Kudos, @ZeApelido 
Invented Work From Home for Uber Drivers ... Elon's gonna be pissed
I say, nuke Panama and push it into the ocean and connect Atlantic to Pacific directly. Canals are so last century.
Worth it for getting my Tesla two days earlier.
Global energy storage integrator market grows increasingly competitive in 2022 | Wood Mackenzie
The global Battery Energy Storage Systems integrator market has grown increasingly competitive in 2022, with the top five global system integrators accounting for 62% of overall BESS shipments.
www.woodmac.com
About 10% better than the start of the week. Hurray to all y'all with couches!
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
Haha, you jest but the closure of the Panama isthmus around 6-9 million yrs ago, with the subsequent effect on the Atlantic meridonal overturning current (MOC), may have lead to the present cycle of glacial/inter-glacials epochs:
Molnar, P. (2008). Closing of the Central American Seaway and the Ice Age: A critical review. Paleoceanography, 23(2).
"Don't cross the streams, Egon."
Dan Detweiler
Active Member
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
