Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Didn't think my reservation was that far forward, but I've received an invitation to go ahead and order. :oops:o_O

Not quite ready to pull the trigger this early on though... so will hold off. :(:rolleyes:

I wonder how many others are doing the same?

View attachment 1003415
Seems like a good idea for Tesla to go through the entire reservation list and offer Foundation series to everyone, then start over at the top for regular orders.
 
Gizmochina is reporting that Tesla will be adopting TSMC's 3nm process next year for its FSD computer and that analysts project Tesla as TSMC's seventh largest customer.

Does anybody here have insight into this? Is this report credible? Would this indicate that Tesla is stepping up the pace of its innovation cycle on the FSD computer?

 
The next version is definitely needed. Tesla still has to make the decision for longer range trucks though. If cell density improves they have the choice of creating a truck with the same range using fewer cells and having higher production overall vs same # trucks and cells but each one with greater range. I think the sales data makes the latter more achievable if there is a proven market.

Why wouldn’t they do both ? There is a market for trucks in the mid 300 miles of range and a smaller but not insignificant market for trucks with range closer to 500 miles.
 
Gizmochina is reporting that Tesla will be adopting TSMC's 3nm process next year for its FSD computer and that analysts project Tesla as TSMC's seventh largest customer.

Does anybody here have insight into this? Is this report credible? Would this indicate that Tesla is stepping up the pace of its innovation cycle on the FSD computer?


I seriously doubt Tesla is TSMC’s largest overall customer. Maybe 7th largest for the 3nm process.
The article does not say if this is a new chip or if an existing design is being moved to a new process mode so it’s hard to say anything about the pace of innovation other than the fact they are moving to the latest process which should improve power and speed.
 
Why wouldn’t they do both ? There is a market for trucks in the mid 300 miles of range and a smaller but not insignificant market for trucks with range closer to 500 miles.

I wonder if that huge under bed storage area could be used for a battery expansion. It is a little to far to the back for my liking although not sure how franz would deal with that.
 
Early indications suggest people think Robotaxi will be a four seater. That would certainly make the platform ready for a preceding 4/5 seat M2. And therefore not this:
View attachment 1003360
Has the introduction of M2 increased the eventual size of the Robotaxi?
Robotaxi is to displace the daily driver. Observing HOV lanes we see that 90% of vehicles on our city highways carry only one passenger at a time. When is the last time you sat in the front seat of a taxi? With driver removed, there is no need for a front seat, nor four doors. I'm convinced the first Robotaxi will be a two door hatchback, ride height of a Model Y for comfort and ease of entry/exit, something like the crude cut/paste image below. If folded unpainted stainless steel panels are less expensive than painted stamped steel, they will be incorporated into a more angled design as above (minus those funky impractical doors).

Screen Shot 2023-12-27 at 11.28.25 AM.png


But Tesla won't stop there. For the remaining 10% of rides required with family in tow, a four or six seater + room for luggage Robotaxi shuttle van will be available. But Tesla will tackle the far larger single (or double) passenger Robotaxi market first. It is all about scale, efficiencies and keeping costs down.
 
Last edited:

Elon looking back on the X... I believe other comments at the time talked about the Falcon Wing doors as being much of it:

"In retrospect, it would've been a better decision to do fewer things with the first version of Model X and roll out" new features more slowly over time, Musk told investors on a conference call. "I think there was some hubris there with the X."

Despite all that, Musk quickly added that all the Model X's features add up to "the best car ever" — an extremely ambitious vehicle that no other automaker would dare attempt.

"I'm not sure Tesla would make a car like this again," he joked.
So not sure they'd do that again on the compact model... or if they feel they've figured them out enough that they aren't a "new feature"... I suspect more traditional doors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AZRI11 and madodel
If you want to sell in large numbers, just make a good small hatchback/crossover at a low price.

The Bolt and Bolt EUV show the way. Gives up a bit of cargo space behind the rear seats to give a roomy cabin with a flat floor. Plenty quick enough (EUV 0-60 in 6.8s). Maintenance schedule is mostly "rotate tires".

When the tax credits hit, it flew off the lots, despite no AWD option, slow DCFC and no heat pump.
GM will make a Boltium as soon as LGES can make LFP cells. Hoping my Volt holds up until then so I might have a reasonable small EV option.
(Tesla doesn't do dumb cruise fallback, GM does and I have several choices of nearby service center.)

Well, I'm not sure the Bolt "show the way" to selling in large numbers.

Now you may argue that it's due to lack of marketing/manufacturing, but I'm not sure I've seen evidence of huge demand either...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ccook and jerry33
Why wouldn’t they do both ? There is a market for trucks in the mid 300 miles of range and a smaller but not insignificant market for trucks with range closer to 500 miles.
I hope they do. The other passenger vehicles (3,Y,S,X) have mainly focused on volume production over pack capacity expansion (e.g. Model S has been capped at c.100KWh since 2016, although range has improved in that time) which has been guiding my thought that they need to actively decide on capacity increases for additional range.
 
  • Like
Reactions: navguy12
Owning a BMW i3 for 6 years has convinced me that 'suicide doors' are a disaster and practically unuseable. They drive us crazy....

Just getting people or things in and out of the back seat is mission impossible - unless you have about 10 feet clear.
They may look cool but I hate them with a passion.

Now if the i3 had sensible doors (and wheels), it would be even more wonderful

Hmmm... the rear "suicide door" doesn't extend farther out than the front "normal door":

View attachment 1003433

Is the need for 10 feet of clearance because the open rear door forces you to bring items in at a perpendicular angle, rather than a shallower angle from the rear?
 
  • Like
Reactions: madodel
I'm not sure there is much room to expand the current pack, unless they remove 100mm of ground clearance. Need those additional cell energy density increases.
I was thinking more about them getting the advantage of Cybercell 2/3 energy density improvements and not shrinking the existing pack footprint. I haven't looked at the engineering specs closely enough re additional room, but they have managed a split pack with the range extender - so presumably there would be better implementations of a split pack than the extender if they decided that a permanent larger pack is desirable.