I think you were going for "'omission vs '[c]omission".
Regardless,
@Krugerrand asked the question I, and likely others, had. The original post did not specify why Tesla *specifically* needed to take note. I still don't know that it has been answered.
But I'm sure glad I wasn't the one who asked...
Like ouch!
Not that the rest of the follow up clarified anything:
Done is general past tense timeline filtering. If there is not a past action nor inaction to reference, a warning to a specific entity is unwarranted.
Is not a strong reason to call out Tesla to 'take Note'. "To the extent which there has been any friction between Tesla and organized labor - and by friction I mean any interaction of any sort - then by the immutable laws of pure logic Tesla has sinned."???
People/groups can create friction (let's not leave it at the level of mere "interaction") for their own interests, not because there is an actual failure.
By that 'immutable logic', our mods have sinned everytime there is forum friction (including this chain)...
It's even less understandable with the recent European events in which the majority of Tesla employees have rejected the advances of the union organizers...