Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Curious question. Our neighbour caught us using summons to park our car in our garage today. (We have a project in the garage and it’s tight for opening the door so we are just using summon to put it in and out of the garage for a few days). He asked me if all teslas come standard with that and I didn’t know how to answer that. I’m not sure any new tesla has summons anymore. What say yee? Is summon a bygone feature now?

Thanks in advance.
 
Curious question. Our neighbour caught us using summons to park our car in our garage today. (We have a project in the garage and it’s tight for opening the door so we are just using summon to put it in and out of the garage for a few days). He asked me if all teslas come standard with that and I didn’t know how to answer that. I’m not sure any new tesla has summons anymore. What say yee? Is summon a bygone feature now?

Thanks in advance.
Requires CAD$7800 "Enhanced Autopilot" option
1707629887917.png
 
Weekend OT:

Fun fact: the fastest I've ever travelled is 775 mph ground speed in a Boeing 747-400 in Sep 1997. Originally, my airline had assigned a vanilla 767 for the mid-range distance flt from Honolulu to Vancouver. Alas, the rubber band broke and the airline told us they would put us up in a hotel overnight instead. Hey, free dinner and a soft bed in Waikiki, 'A' ole pilikia... :D

However, around 11 pm the concierge knocked on my hotel room door and said "Change of plan! We've arranged for a replacement airplane, and we take off in 1 hour! Please make your way to the buses now waiting in the parkade".

The replacement was the Boeing 747-475, the pride of Canadian Airlines, sporting 4 mighty Rolls-Royce RB211 turbofans. This A/C had just flown from Montreal to Vancouver, and was retasked to fetch us from Hawaii before it's planned return to Montreal in the morning (I presume w. a crew change).

When we arrived at the departure terminal at PHNL, we were hurried through security (pre-9/11) and escorted directly to our assigned seats. After a high-speed taxi, the plane did a rolling left turn onto the departure runway, throttles to the wall, and climbed like a fighter jet to FL430 in 13 minutes! (we only took on fuel for a 2700 nm leg + IFR reserves, and had only the reduced # of pax aboard that would fit in a much smaller 767-300) so we were well below gross. To say that ship climbed like a homesick angel is not to trivialize the feat: it was breathtaking, visceral in the way only pilots can appreciate.

Once at cruise altitude, the Flt Crew steered us 500 miles North to intercept the jet stream, blowing a fierce 175 kts at 43,000' altitude. The planned time of flt was too short to show a movie, so throughout the flight the on-board screens displayed a moving map w. Direction + Ground Speed. Just about 275 miles West of Vancouver Island, the map showed a groundspeed of 775 mph, which was the combination of true airspeed and component tail.

Shortly thereafter, the engines went remarkably quiet, and you felt a slight drop in pressure in your ears as engine bleed air decreased. We maintained altitude to reduce airspeed for 25 miles, then the plane began its decent although we were still 250 miles West of CYVR. Now don't say there's no Cowboys left in the West; those 2 jocks brought that plane down at avg 3,000' per min all the way down to 6,000' to join the CASDY THREE Arrival for Rwy 26L. :D

Wheels up in Honolulu to wheels down in Vancouver: 4 hrs 5 min. Distance 2,750 nm. Avg speed: 675 mph. The Aircrew hustled us off the plane even as the maintenance staff was tidying up cushions and vacuuming carpets. I was still standing in line waiting to enter Customs as I saw our magnificent Canadian Goose push back from the jetway and taxi out for its scheduled departure for Montreal, only 40 min behind schedule. What an awesome marvel of engineering! What a team!

And what a great rubber-band-break story!
Paging @Papafox 'your turn'. ;)

P.S. The a/c C-GMWW was sold to Air Canada, resold & retired, and now broken up
P.P.S. The last "Jumbo Jet" aircraft, a 747-8F for Atlas Air registered N863GT, rolled off the production line on December 6, 2022, and was delivered on January 31, 2023.
End of an era, the fond memories remain...

c-gmww-canadian-airlines-boeing-747-475_PlanespottersNet_1037962_101a77ebc5_o.jpg
OK Artful Dodger, here's my reply to your off-topic fastest flight story

You win the contest, my friend. I never in my life have flown at a groundspeed of 775 mph. That was an impressive flight! I've experienced tailwinds approaching 120 knots, but that's kid's stuff compared to your story. During my career as a TWA pilot we never had the super-deluxe 400 series version of the B-747. All of ours were early models that included a flight engineer. Pilots at other airlines referred to these old workhorses as "rope-starts". Sigh.

Nonetheless, I have a story:

Fastest airplane within 150 feet of me
While spending a few hours at the airport in Tonopah, NV back in 1977 (I was flying bank materials in a Cessna 180) I saw an amazing sight: a red and white F-104 starfighter jet landing at our forsaken former WWII bomber field. A guy named Darryl Greenamyer was a former Lockheed test pilot who had collected spare parts found in airplane junk yards all over the country, and he managed to put together a full F-104 Starfighter. I was so smitten as a kid with this sexy jet that if given a choice between seeing my favorite starlet completely naked or touching an F-104, I would have chosen the latter. The navy was nice enough to loan him an engine and it was off to Mud Lake near Tonopah to set a record for the fastest flight ever over a closed course.

The next day I flew my employer's little Cessna and landed on Mud Lake to watch the spectacle. Clay Lacy brought his Learjet but he and all the prudent observers stayed about a quarter mile away in case something went terribly wrong. We had about a dozen of us right next to the course. Daryl's dad was lining up cars to create some depth perception and making sure their windows were rolled down (to keep them from being blown out). I spent half an hour talking to this really nice guy who was very knowledgeable and later learned he was Tony Levier, famed Lockheed test pilot who tested everything from the P-38 to the U-2 spy plane.

When the first pass of the Starfighter came, any video would have shown a young guy about six feet in the air with his hands up, looking terribly surprised. That was me. Since he was traveling faster than sound you could not hear him approaching. It was just the flash of the plane zooming by about 100 feet high with a simultaneous BOOM (not the usual ba-boom). For his next pass I was ready and this sense of speed was truly overwhelming. You'd see this little red dot near the horizon and then suddenly it was about 150 feet away, very big, faster than hell, and the BOOM came simultaneously. As he left you could see the glow of the afterburner. He made several passes and averaged 1010 mph. Unfortunately one of the timing cameras malfunctioned and he needed to do the whole thing over again at a later date. His second (slightly slower) record still stands.

feb9f104.jpg
 
Last edited:
No, Bradford is just uninformed. He conflates the GWh delivered per quarterly reports with Revenue Recognition: they are NOT the same thing. There are numerous milestones which must be reached following delivery of the Megapack to the customer site, ie: connection to the grid, commissioning, etc. These take time, just look how long it's been since the Giga Texas megapacks were lifted by crane onto their permanent mounts and they are still not connected.

Further, Bradford still has not disabued himself of his mistaken notion that Lathrop had 40 GWh installed capacity last fall, and they were going to double it to 80. That's just wrong, I have no idea where he got that idea. The 1st half of the Lathrop Megafactory was sized for 5K megapacks per year, or 20 GWh given 4MWh storage per Megapack. This is what Tesla and Drew told us a year ago, did Bradford forget, or did he trust his (faulty) memory instead of locating the source of the information? The 2nd half is what is being build in 2024, again per Drew on the 2023 Q4 Conference Call.

Sorry, but Brad is a investment advisor, and doesn't demonstrate strong skills for project mgmt.

More about Tesla Energys future profits on this clip.

 
In video he is mostly trying to find some plausible explanation for why the margins are not super high. Maybe some component is super expensive?! There are not a lot of components and we know that the other components are not expensive. So maybe the inverter is super expensive?! Or maybe it's not and the margins are very high but deferred revenue, ramping costs etc are artificially hurting margins for now and they will rise in the future. Anyway even if inverters are super expensive and difficult to source, I would assume that Tesla/Elon are working hard to in-house it and cut that cost and increase the supply very soon... One way or another the margins will eventually go up to where they should be.
Maybe margins might just stabilize. After all utility-level storage now has many competitors all offering highly integrated modular solutions. Tesla has advantages in packaging for sole transport, in product maturity, software cohesion, features and integration. Those may well give lower cost of production for Tesla. Still, each of their battery suppliers also sell integrated solutions. BYD, CATL (directly and indirectly), Huawei, Honeywell, Siemens, LG, Samsung and so on.

I have no doubt the market is gigantic, rising every day. Margins are more likely to have stabilized than to continue rising. Tesla is not making their own batteries for these, unlike, say, CATL, BYD, Samsung and LG.

Again I’m very bullish on this market, how not to be? Demand will exceed supply for years, maybe decades, even if it were limited only to peaker replacement, grid services, renewable intermediation, remote locations and industrial power. It is NOT so limited.
 
Superbowl ads are always a bad idea, unless your target market completely overlaps with American sports fans. For a global company, that is looking to build up specific markets, in specific demographics, its insane.
Frankly any TV or movie theater ad is ridiculous. These things only exist because they were established before the internet allowed proper audience targeting and tracked the results. Given a choice between picking very specific targets based on youtube viewing history and IP address versus just spamming a big expensive advert on a single day, for a single sport, for a single country...

Yes I get it, the superbowl is well known, and people outside the USA watch it. But frankly people inside the USA often forget that the USA is not the whole universe. Apart from anything, your superbowl ad is provided in a single language. Madness.

Superbowl ads are the option picked by middle aged CEOs with zero understanding of marketing or targeting. Its a real coup for the people selling those ads that they constantly find a queue of companies with more money than sense to sell them to. I suspect a big chunk of the appeal is to the ego of the CEO. Anyone working in marketing analytics is probably drinking themselves unconscious on the day the CEO orders a TV/movie/superbowl advert.
It is proven that the more you hear about a brand or a politician, the more you are inclined to subconsciously select it at the next time you go to the story and buy something with a quick decision. Pretty much a whole chapter in that in the Nobel Prize author winner psychologist Daniel Kahnenan book Thinking Fast And Slow
 
Mengy said:
Elon could die suddenly and Tesla could fall apart.



Slight adjustment:

Elon could suddenly die or even just step down from Tesla, and the same journalists and analysts currently saying Elon is ruining the company and killing the stock would instantly be telling everybody that, without Elon, the company is doomed.

There would be a huge pile-on, and the stock price would definitely drop tremendously.

Naturally, nobody stops buying cars or batteries just because one guy at a company dies...so production and sales would continue (and grow).

We would have confidence that the drop would only last until the rest of the Tesla team made it plainly obvious that the company was still made up of 100,000+ driven people on a solid mission...but it would probably stay lower than it should for longer than it should.
Steve Jobs was Apple, he died, look what happened next...

Of course Elon is the face of Tesla, he's talismanic, as was Jobs at Apple, his philosophy is built into Tesla's DNA, as was Jobs' with Apple

I think one think in favour of Apple is that we all knew Jobs was going to die once the cancer diagnosis was revealed, and he took steps to appoint Tim as successor pretty quickly, I think it's important, as has been mentioned many times, that Elon does have a successor visibly lined-up, even if there's no intention to leave the company any time soon
 
It is proven that the more you hear about a brand or a politician, the more you are inclined to subconsciously select it at the next time you go to the story and buy something with a quick decision. Pretty much a whole chapter in that in the Nobel Prize author winner psychologist Daniel Kahnenan book Thinking Fast And Slow
Yup read it. I found 'seducing the subconscious' and 'the advertised mind' to be better, and focused 100% on subconscious advertising.
75% of my biz expenses are advertising, I study the area a lot!

I am well aware of the power of subconscious advertising. I fully support it. I also, however, strongly support targeted and optimised advertising. There is no 'one size fits all' approach to branding. The attitudes of Koreans and Chinese to luxury products is VASTLY different to that of the US and especially western Europe. Lots of US marketing with its carefully chosen multicultural smiling families based on the demographics of Los Angeles looks ridiculous in othe countries...
I think people in the US often think that stuff that appeals to them, appeals to everyone. Not true. A twentysomething single male in Poland will not respond to the same ad as a 50+ divorced woman in Seoul. The idea of using the same marketing message to a vast audience is the sort of thing that was in vogue with 'mad men'. Its absolutely useless in 2024.

If I could use AI to compose truly unique ads to show to every possible customer, I would do so. The ROI on targeted ads is WAY beyond that of mass media splurges. A superbowl ad is like apple building a flashy HQ building. Its what CEOs do when the cash pile gets too big and they don't know what to do next.

TBH I think Elon knows this. Its no surprise that Tesla spends their small ad budget on targetable platforms like X or youtube. When you see that Tesla ad on X, thats for you specifically. Thats how to do it!
 
"New Model Y RWD and Long Range AWD prices reduced for deliveries now through February 29. Prices will increase by $1,000 or more on March 1"

New starting prices:
• Model Y RWD: $42,990 ($1k cut)
• Model Y Long Range: $47,990 ($1k cut)
• Model Y Performance: No change"
I woke up to an Apple News-pushed story about Tesla SLASHING prices on Model Y’s.

Not sure that was the right descriptor to use.😣
 
Steve Jobs was Apple, he died, look what happened next...

Of course Elon is the face of Tesla, he's talismanic, as was Jobs at Apple, his philosophy is built into Tesla's DNA, as was Jobs' with Apple

I think one think in favour of Apple is that we all knew Jobs was going to die once the cancer diagnosis was revealed, and he took steps to appoint Tim as successor pretty quickly, I think it's important, as has been mentioned many times, that Elon does have a successor visibly lined-up, even if there's no intention to leave the company any time soon

You summarized perfectly what I was going to post. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max Plaid

In an attempt to clear things up, Tesla has sent out an email to employees that no refresh Model Y will be launching in North America this year.

According to the email, a copy of which was obtained by Drive Tesla, the automaker said “it is important we communicate transparently that there is no refresh for the Model Y launching this year.”

Tesla ends the email by saying “there is no better time for customers to start driving the world’s best-selling vehicle,” highlighting the incentives available for the electric SUV.
Not surprising at all. We saw refreshed "camouflaged" Model 3s for MONTHS before they went into production in China (and then took 5 more months to do the same here in the U.S.) To my knowledge, we have yet to see even a single Model Y refresh test mule so a "year +" seems pretty likely. What I DO think we will get is the very, very mild "refresh" we just saw on the Y in China (i.e. added the dash only LED and maybe a couple other minor items). That may be imminent (especially with Tesla offering a February only $1K discount now), but isn't a material update. Indeed, the most material updates (pre-Juniper) to the Model Y will likely be complete if we get that dash LED update - these include the items introduced in 2023 (i.e. softened suspension and hardware 4 cameras and computer) and the new "ultra red" and "stealth gray" color options introduced this year. While the "I want it now!" in me would desire it today, from a business perspective, I like that Tesla is spacing this stuff out. Heck, it may be less "strategy" and more "practical limitation" - I'm guessing it is more than a little challenging to refresh Model 3 and Model Y while simultaneously launching the Cybertruck!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: alhounos
It is proven that the more you hear about a brand or a politician, the more you are inclined to subconsciously select it at the next time you go to the story and buy something with a quick decision. Pretty much a whole chapter in that in the Nobel Prize author winner psychologist Daniel Kahnenan book Thinking Fast And Slow
True for low engagement and or spontaneous product decisions. Neither is in any way connected to major purchase commitments such as cars and dwellings. Brand, in Marketing terms is most valuable for the least planned decisions. Brand does play a role elsewhere but much less so.

For Kahneman specifically, since "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk” (1979) developed with Amos Tversky I have considered his research to be highly useful. The limits come explicitly from his work itself because the popular works condense continuums into binary views. That is essential for popular views, but not for the basic science. Where his work is most valuable is in differentiated between differing perspectives based on prejudice (NOT perjorative in this context) when preconceptions directly influence low impact decisions. These, without doubt brand is very important, awareness only slightly less so. Those fit Type I. Even with all the research Type 2 tends certainly to be present in more consequential decisions.

The purest form of Kahneman/Tversky considers psychology, sociology and 'rational' data. They and later Kahneman alone has managed to come closer to describing such phenomena than has nearly anyone else.
My personal view is that at Berkeley (his PhD) and at Hebrew U (Center for Rationality) he viscerally saw every angle from both Psychology and 'Rationaality'. In the end the popular book chose to describe all this in a binary Type 1 /Type 2 basis. Quippy, but a disservice to his stellar accomplishments. Nothing at all that affects any human decision is quite so neatly binary. Of course, he also knows simplicity sells books, especially with Nobel Prize emblazoned as a motivational sales aide.