You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, there are lot of Tesla qualified gray&black mechanics that can be taxi-cabed in few days notice..."...Around eight o'clock on Monday morning, a taxi arrived at Tesla's car workshop in Umeå, where almost all the workers went on strike last Friday..."
We cal them scabs here.Yes, there are lot of Tesla qualified gray&black mechanics that can be taxi-cabed in few days notice...
I'm always pro-underdog. In most cases workers have vastly less power than the employer. That is why you need unions and collective bargaining.
The problem is - some people take all the things achieved through a hundred years of hard work by unions. If you want to see how bad things were before unions - checkout some of the sweatshops in poorer regions of the world.
How many of you folks on this forum has read this book?
No one doubts the excellent work unions have done in the past, or the fact that at many companies today unions are needed to prevent some companies taking unfair advantage of workers.I'm always pro-underdog. In most cases workers have vastly less power than the employer. That is why you need unions and collective bargaining.
The problem is - some people take for granted all the things achieved through a hundred years of hard work by unions. If you want to see how bad things were before unions - checkout some of the sweatshops in poorer regions of the world.
FTFY.I read it about a decade ago; very enlightening if one has only been exposed topopular history.corporate propaganda.
We need to distinguish between shop workers and corporate workers, esp engineers. I'm sure engineers can easily quit and find another job. So, generally they have decent amount of power (more on that later).Those that have some doubts about whether unions are needed at Tesla (like me), are claiming Tesla is the exception, not the rule.
What is exceptional is a flat management structure, good communication, team spirit, a common mission, and reasonably empowered employees who seem to be fairly compensated. What part of this will unions improve?
My main concern is that unions will damage - "a flat management structure, good communication, and reasonably empowered employees"
Why I say that damage might occur is the union might get overly involved in communication between workers and management, reducing the amount of effective communication, and reducing trust.
Prevention is the best cureWhen you don't have the disease even the best medication has unwanted side effects, for no real benefit.
My point is that doesn't come for free, and it isn't free of consequences.Prevention is the best cure
This raises a well known classic problem called a "free rider problem". Economists typically consider free rider problem to be an example of market failure.To be clear, if union membership can be considered an "Insurance Policy" it should be up to individual workers as to whether or not they think they need it.
IMO the union should only intervene when it is needed, as distinct from creating a role to expand the fee base.
Tesla should no inhibit union membership, or discriminate against union members.
Making people pay for service they don't want is also a problem.This raises a well known classic problem called a "free rider problem". Economists typically consider free rider problem to be an example of market failure.
Collective bargaining will always have this type of conflict. If people don't have to pay, they become free riders. If they have to pay, they get the benefits but also the costs of the collective bargain. Efficiency has a specific meaning in economics, and free choice as you call it is actually not efficient. You are articulating a more simplistic common person's view of free choice and perhaps it makes sense to you. I'm just saying that the issue is a bit more complex than that from an economist's perspective.Making people pay for service they don't want is also a problem.
The union is only obligated to act on behalf of customers.
Someone joining because they have a problem is an issue, but it is also good marketing for the union.
Anyone not in the union is negotiating their own wages.
If workers genuinely have a "free choice" that is the most efficient way to resolve the issue.
All I am saying is I've seen no real evidence any of the Swedish Tesla workers want to join as union and want to collectively bargain.Collective bargaining will always have this type of conflict. If people don't have to pay, they become free riders. If they have to pay, they get the benefits but also the costs of the collective bargain. Efficiency has a specific meaning in economics, and free choice as you call it is actually not efficient. You are articulating a more simplistic common person's view of free choice and perhaps it makes sense to you. I'm just saying that the issue is a bit more complex than that from an economist's perspective.
If there is no minimum wage, then you can employ someone who is about to die of thirst in exchange for two glasses of juice and some might say that is a free choice. Others might call it exploitation. It depends on how simplistic you want to frame "choice" as.