adiggs
Well-Known Member
From my point of view, the government has already interfered by allowing a government function to be hijacked by the union, a private entity. The union called for the government to not satisfy a government function (mail delivery) to another private party, and the government has both complied, as well as gone to court to sustain their right to follow the union's direction to not provide service.This conflict is left to the two parties involved to solve. The government doesn't interfere.
As I said - that's the part that blows my mind.
The rest of it - I have no real problem with the legality. At least where I live, garbage pickup is a monopoly for a private business with government oversight. That's not how it works everywhere. Were that to happen here - a government granted monopoly refusing to provide its service to some (anybody), that would be a serious problem and probably illegal, but I don't know anything about the details on how that works. But garbage pickup in my limited experience isn't directly a government function, so sympathy strike on that front is gray enough that it at least doesn't blow my mind.
I think its all silly, but successfully drafting the government into the argument on the union's side is either brilliant, or completely normal and expected. In the latter case its easy for me to see why there are few and only short duration strikes in the country.