Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Blog Tesla Workers Say Skipped Soft-Tooling Phase Ups Danger Inside ‘Production Hell’

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Two pro-union workers from Tesla’s Fremont factory are speaking out about potential safety risks related to frantic efforts to hit production goals for the Model 3.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has said the company is entering “production hell.” With heightened stress at the factory, the two workers fear that excessive overtime will result in overworked, tired workers who become more prone to injuries.

The workers told Business Insider that Tesla skipped a trial run on new equipment designed for Model 3 production. Instead, they used computer simulations to design and order the final production tools. The workers fear that trouble with the equipment could lead to worker injury.

“I have my doubts with that because, just like anything new, there are always going to be adjustments that need to be made and you can’t guarantee a flawless, injury-free line right off the launch,” Michael Catura, a Tesla battery production associate, told the Business Insider. “You’re going to have to deal with all the bugs, all the kinks.”

There are growing unionization efforts by workers at the plant. The concerns shared with Business Insider come just more than a week after a group of Tesla employees sent a letter to the company’s board of directors requesting access to Tesla’s safety plan, clarity on compensation and neutrality, and non-retaliation agreements in an effort toward unionization. The efforts are led by the “Tesla Workers’ Organizing Committee.”

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it’s designed to operate with much human involvement there obviously won’t be much danger to workers as they won’t be around the robots while it’s running. A computer sim would be sufficient. No idea how much of it is currently that way. I know that’s the end goal though.
 
Trying to throw spaghetti at the wall to see if it sticks. Nope. Keep

I was UAW, and I can tell you that California UAW locals are subservient to the Michigan UAW locals and national UAW. If killing Tesla helps Detroit UAW contracts, those Cal organizers will be flipping burgers sooner than they think. The UAW owes nothing to California workers. That's why they killed the auto and aerospace industries here, to push production elsewhere.
 
I thought UAW controls the Canadian auto factories too.
UAW used to represent Canadian workers. They now have their own union, the CAW, under the umbrella of Unifor. Still union. Tesla's best bet would be to locate a plant in a right-to-work state, which are now 28 out of the 50 states. I'm sure they'd be welcome with open arms in many states.
 
Once again the UAW angle is used to merely dismiss the bit of news. While that is certainly very likely to be clouding the writing and adding drama to it, I think it is another data point in Tesla's approach.

If accurate, it seems they skipped a trial related to testing the equipment before ordering the full setup? Instead opting to go ahead right to the full monty...

After all, they also skipped a beta vehicle for Model 3, in an effort to streamline and speed up the process. That, I believe, they noted even by themselves.

Now, put this on context on the ship early, finish and change later product manufacturing culture at Tesla and IMO it makes sense this skip could indeed have happened.

Interesting point, then.

The conjecture from that (both in the PR and on TMC) I tend to ignore. Too much bias to know whether or not it means anything regarding safety or the like.

It is just an interesting data point IMO at this stage. Seems plausible it happened.

Kudos to TMC Staff for reporting an unpopular topic.
 
Once again the UAW angle is used to merely dismiss the bit of news. While that is certainly very likely to be clouding the writing and adding drama to it, I think it is another data point in Tesla's approach.

If accurate, it seems they skipped a trial related to testing the equipment before ordering the full setup? Instead opting to go ahead right to the full monty...

After all, they also skipped a beta vehicle for Model 3, in an effort to streamline and speed up the process. That, I believe, they noted even by themselves.

The problem with your argument is that the trial equipment skip and associated risks is not news. It's been known for MONTHS:

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN17Q0DE

"Most automakers test a new model's production line by building vehicles with relatively cheap, prototype tools designed to be scrapped once they deliver doors that fit, body panels with the right shape and dashboards that don't have gaps or seams.

Tesla, however, is skipping that preliminary step and ordering permanent, more expensive equipment as it races to launch its Model 3 sedan by a self-imposed volume production deadline of September, Musk told investors last month." - Reuters, April 24, 2017




Kudos to TMC Staff for reporting an unpopular topic.

No, they published a one-sided story with agenda driven inuendo, and you fell for it.
 
Two reasons:
  • It's Tesla related news.
  • There is high % of socialist readers on this board.

I imagine capitalists and socialists alike both like the concept of "at-will" employment.

You don't like where you are working? Give the finger to your slaver overlords and go work somewhere else.

People complaining about issues rather than finding out how to rise above them is the bane of progress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulmo
A one-sided article with speculation on whether use of computer simulations are a safety issue.

This is so devoid of substance that it is bordering on being fake news.

Computer simulations are used to build medical devices implanted into your body and evaluating the yield of both conventional and nuclear weapons.

The use of computer simulation to build a car is -TRIVIAL- in comparison.