johnnybgood888
Member
good question. sincerely. and thanks for the acknowledgement.
I don't only use traditional metrics to judge them. I've stated repeatedly that this company is not worth it's current value with respect to traditional auto companies. it's worth much more than that.
but what I do is start with what it's worth in comparison... then extrapolate due to reasonable speculation.
starting with the latter, it hurts I know, but it looks like this:
TSLA has a current value when directly compared to it's sector of a $12B market cap. That's $70 PPS. That's a raw direct comparison to how virtually ALL auto companies currently trade.
Then I ask, are ALL auto companies currently trading lower than they should?... answer, no. it's a tough industry filled with large scale high volume competition. so, there's nothing that suggests there's some sort of massive mis-valuation of the existing industry.
Then I consider the qualitative value of speculation warranted for TSLA based on historical performance of growth targets... and I ask myself, is anything beyond double the current value warranted?
I have no reason to suggest so. Give me a reason... Space Man?... $60m in TE revs? Certainly not M3 success... Certainly not modest MS/MX growth...
so, my valuation based on current risk of continuous failed performance is zero more than double current value...
or $140 PPS.
and I'm absolutely certain that TSLA will not trade higher than its current PPS in 2020. they are currently "transforming" from a hyper growth company to a "traditional" auto company. where the PPS will either land between $75 and $100 or they'll show some sort of TE growth where they'll be able to maintain a greater than $125 PPS into the 2020s.
I appreciate posts like these from you because it does come across as well thought out from your side. I guess where we differ is on the valuation. I agree that TSLA is probably somewhat slightly overvalued based on their current financial picture, but I think you swing too far to the other side.
At $12B market cap, they are at about a P/S of 1, which is absolutely undervalue for a growing company, let alone a traditional auto company. We both know that we cannot use a P/E ratio to value TSLA as they will most likely not have a positive P/E for the foreseeable future (nor would they want to, if they want to continue a 50% growth rate). TSLA will most likely have trailing 12 months revenue close to $20B by the end of this year (based on my conservative guess of an average of 3500 M3/wk for the whole year), if not sometime early next, which gives a P/S of around 3 based on current market cap. By that point, their current share price to me is justified, especially if they are showing positive cash flow.
I think the true picture of TSLA lies somewhere between you and where some of the ultra bulls would like to see it. As a shareholder, I would love to see TSLA at $1000 per share, but I think the more realistic price would be around $450-500 when M3 ramps up to 5000/wk. That is about as far as I am comfortable predicting for the next 2 quarters. But as we have all seen, TSLA has a way of making predictions and the people who make them look silly over and over again whether the prediction is bullish or bearish. I'd be happy to have pie on my face if TSLA zooms past my numbers.
I think your thesis relies on your belief that Elon and co. will not be able to execute the ramp, or execute it in time before they run out of money, and that is definitely a possibility. If that is the case, they will have to tap the market for more cash and that will definitely dampen the share price some more, but I do believe that option will be available to them. I don't see a scenario where they run out of money and have no recourse.