You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because he only invested $15k. It’s a pretext to suing Elon if the deal doesn’t go through. He can claim damages. If the deal does go through, he makes money. Win win.
I am certain that I will go make coffee for myself this morning.Don't forget that Musk also tweeted: "Investor support is confirmed. Only reason why this is not certain is that it’s contingent on a shareholder vote."
"Certain" is a strong word, and it means something. I don't think Elon could say this without having a written agreement with terms specifying $420. That would be dishonest. If it turns out all he has is a verbal understanding with someone, he will be crucified. And rightly so.
And if he does sue, the CNBC clip will be played and the case dismissed, since his claim is he was deceived by Elon, and bought on the tweet. More foolish than I already thought he was.Because he only invested $15k. It’s a pretext to suing Elon if the deal doesn’t go through. He can claim damages. If the deal does go through, he makes money. Win win.
Assuming the transcript is ballpark correct, this guy is buying calls (usually bullish) with the intent to sue later? That's the only way I can interpret it. But if you stand in front of a train, you don't get to sue the railway.Watched it live and can confirm the same.
This reminded me of one of my favorite Spinal Tap scenes:Sit down.
Look at me.
Ready?
Are you listening?
Hey! Pay attention. Leave your dolly alone.
Look at me!!!
Yes, some people really are that slow. We don’t use the word stupid. That might hurt their feelings.
Does he have grounds to sue making an investment believing Elon is lying? If you invest $ and you believe he’s lying, even if he is and had violated SEC rules etc,, it’s then your bad. But if you stated you believed him, and lost $, then that would be different.Because he only invested $15k. It’s a pretext to suing Elon if the deal doesn’t go through. He can claim damages. If the deal does go through, he makes money. Win win.
This reminded me of one of my favorite Spinal Tap scenes:
Would you be certain if you had no coffee available, but had a verbal agreement with an acquaintance that he would deliver coffee to you before noon?I am certain that I will go make coffee for myself this morning.
That doesn't mean that there won't be a mechanical error on a helicopter that decides to land in the nearby field, and I go run out and make sure everyone is OK while I call 911, and I don't get to the coffee until the afternoon.
Especially when you have binoculars and train schedule in-hand, and know the train is coming.Assuming the transcript is ballpark correct, this guy is buying calls (usually bullish) with the intent to sue later? That's the only way I can interpret it. But if you stand in front of a train, you don't get to sue the railway.
Capital required is different than what has to be lined up to pursue a privatization. I think one may 'require' only 20-30B in the end (based on probably above 80-85B in total capitalization when all is said and done, but one cannot count on the final decision of shareholders until all is said and done. so with what they have in their pocket (apparently, but there is ZERO evidence of it now) they might have ~40B locked up, so they would have to line up financing to be able to go up to and including the difference. Now, I know it seems like they could line up financing for a range of 20-40B with an option to go up to 50B, but from an investment banking standpoint, agreeing to a range of "sure, we'll do 20B and are able/willing to go up to 35B" doesn't really happen that way.Yep, capital required is decreasing by the minute.
Elon's way too clever for the hapless shorty-shorts!
This reminded me of one of my favorite Spinal Tap scenes:
I am not going to be able to catch up to this thread at work so I don’t know if this has been mentioned yet.
Which ever fund loaning all these shares to shorts must return ALL their shares to the private company. Those fund managers know this. They will recall shorted shares once the deal is clear. They will give all the rope the shorts need to hang theyselves now.
Would you be certain if you had no coffee available, but had a verbal agreement with an acquaintance that he would deliver coffee to you before noon?
More to the point, would you issue a SEC-regulated communication that your morning coffee was "certain", if billions of dollars of investor money depended on the coffee?
This is why investor communications tend to come on Forms 8-K, with appropriate disclaimers regarding contingent events. So there is no misunderstanding that might hurt your stockholders.
I don’t drink coffee.