Reciprocity
Active Member
Everything was cut in half I'm 2008. Your wrong because no companies this size are growing at 50%+ every year with a clear path to continue to grow at that pace or faster for the next decade or more. People are willing to pay a premium for that kind of growth and Amazon is a prime example. Once Amazon finally built it's business to scale, profits followed. Tesla is no different.Amazon in 2007 (in similar market conditions as we have today) was valued around $30 billion with a TTM revenue of $15 billion AND profitability AND many experiments that weren't quite understood by the general public yet.
Tesla has a TTM revenue of less than $15 billion, doesn't have profitability, but does have many experiments that aren't quite understood by the general public yet (all the things mentioned above that aren't yet significant financial contributors) and is valued at $60 billion.
Based on this information, I'm inclined to believe Tesla has some serious downside potential in the short term (Amazon's 2007 market cap was cut in half to $15 billion during the 2008 crisis). Someone tell me why I'm wrong...
People are going to have to come up with a better argument as to why Tesla shouldn't be valued so high then pointing to Amazon. The only thing these companies share is that grew very fast and didn't any money in the beginning. They are both disruptors, but completely different in that no one is going to die if they go to Costco instead of Amazon. Amazon sells the same crap everyone else does, with few exceptions and didn't really make money until they started selling web services. Would they be anything special without AWS?