TSLA Market Action: 2018 Investor Roundtable

[elasalle]

good premium selling puts. Jan 19 330 for like 50$. If it gets exercised, you buy the stock at 280

 

[pz1975]

I always kick myself when I don't buy more at $325. There will be no kicking this time.

 

[ZeApelido]

Just bought back in (sold at 354) at 326.5.

 

[aznt1217]

Same author as well.

Wtf did I just read.

 

[elasalle]

Now need to wait for TSLA to refute this FUD and SP back up

 

[Curt Renz]

@Curt Renz How are these "reporters" getting away with murder? It's so blatant.

"If it bleeds, it leads". Positive Tesla articles and named sources are not Lora's forte.

 

[Drax7]

Teslas communication Dept should forcefully refute this article,
They should call Cnbc directly and set the record straight .

 

[Curt Renz]

Teslas communication Dept should forcefully refute this article,
They should call Call CNBC directly and set the record straight .

They did so in the article, so the author gets some credit. But most traders and algobots read only click-bait headlines and perhaps the first few lines of an article.

 

[Menifeer]

Sold the Mar 23 $340 Put @ $19.00

 

[Bobbyducati]

picked up [email protected]

 

[Drax7]

They did so in the article, so the author gets some credit. But most traders and algobots read only click-bait headlines and perhaps the first few lines of an article.

Call CNBC directly

 

[Richgoogol]

Scooped up 100 shares at $324.68

 

[dmvevguy]

Just bought 100@ at 325. This is a great deal...

 

[justvisiting]

Thats not an old story, thats a new story
If this was blatantly wrong or "criminal" as some suggest, Tesla would sue CNBC and the Woman personally for defamation. But they don´t, and they don´t give hard data like the first try yield to refute the story. smoke and fire...

 

[SteveG3]

"If it bleeds, it leads". Positive Tesla articles and named sources are not Lora's forte.

some of that sure, but, as I think you yourself have alluded to, with Tesla more is involved than "if it bleeds it leads."

 

[EnergyMax]

Thats not an old story, thats a new story
If this was blatantly wrong or "criminal" as some suggest, Tesla would sue CNBC and the Woman personally for defamation. But they don´t, and they don´t give hard data like the first try yield to refute the story. smoke and fire...

Who gives out first try yield? Never heard of it in silicon chips or cars.

 

[Jayjs20]

Sucks that it dropped, but I bought another call option, so it's all good.

 

[justvisiting]

Who gives out first try yield? Never heard of it in silicon chips or cars.

not on its own, but it would be helpful if they really wanted to end this story

 

[jhm]

 

[Curt Renz]

This is the person I am going to trust to educate me on Auto Manufacturing:


Lora Kolodny
Tech Reporter

At least they know Tesla is a tech company as well.

"If it bleeds, it leads". Positive Tesla articles and named sources are not Lora's forte.

some of that sure, but, as I think you yourself have alluded to, with Tesla more is involved than "if it bleeds it leads."

In the past Kolodny would credit an infamous mini-hedge-fund managing TSLA short-seller as the bird-dog who pointed her toward a possible anti-Tesla situation. After doing that she was heaped with criticism for mentioning his name. This time he was not quoted, so we cannot know if he was involved.