You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tesla always owes a billion or two to their suppliers. It gets paid from sales proceeds as cars are made. New cars are always in production and so suppliers are always supplying parts as Tesla is consuming them. New parts are delivered as old parts are paid for so there is always a balance owed to suppliers; it's actually desirable to see this number growing - it means that production is increasing. If it were to be paid off, that would mean that Tesla isn't getting parts delivery and therefore isn't building cars. At some point in the past some suppliers may have required Tesla to pay in advance and therefore they didn't have such a "debt" but those days are long gone.$10 billion in debt. But that's not such a problem, because most of it is not yet due (so your mortgage analogy is appropriate). The problem is the $2.4 billion owed to suppliers and $850 million owed to depositors, both of which can be demanded almost immediately, together with the $1.2 billion in debt due in the next 12 months.
This morning's news has turned the entire weekend around. Prior to this I think many longs were wondering what Tesla will end the quarter at, afraid that the shorts know something that they don't. Now I think the shoe is on the other foot. At the very least, Tesla is at 200+/day steady rate going into the last week in March, which is 2x what they exited Q4 at (if you believe the Q4 exit steady rate was 700, many believe it to be lower). Another quarter like this and they're pretty close to cash flow neutral. This also leaves room for even more upside surprise.The shorts are the ones waiting for the other shoe to drop on Monday, could Tesla have actually achieved 300/day for the entire week, could it be even higher at the end of the week? (I seem to be obsessed with shoes in this post) I can't wait for Monday
How is that bad?
How is that bad?
This would be fine if Elon hadn't promised we would be at 10,000 cars a week already or whatever the original forecast was.
The problem isn't the actual run rate, which really is ramping up. The problem is Elon's impossible promises which everyone takes seriously and also the fact that he doesn't seem to have left any room for error in terms of the amount of cash on hand his company is holding to see them through the period where they are ramping up and burning cash and not yet cash flow positive.
Elon set these expectations and people are reacting negatively because they are nowhere near the expectations. He's the CEO of a publicly traded company with shareholders. The same shareholders, mind you, who just approved a compensation package which might be worth $50 to $200 billion if the company is successful beyond anyone's wildest dreams. He needs to learn how to be honest with his shareholders and set realistic expectations and make honest production forecasts. I'm not asking for a lot here, am I?
Although (because?) I was an investment banker for 30 years, I have never been a fan of technical analysis. I focus on fundamentals, primarily cashflow.I have no idea, but I'm sure CuriousSunbird will enlighten us.
Or if the part is Tesla-specific.That may be true if the supplier only plan to work with Tesla in 2018
Yes they have, like I said in an earlier post - The last Q call they said they gave themselves a buffer with cash until June.lso the fact that he doesn't seem to have left any room for error in terms of the amount of cash on hand his company is holding to see them through the period where they are ramping up and burning cash and not yet cash flow positive.
Not anyone who has been following Elon's impossible promises. The real question is why would anyone take his projections seriously when they've never been right?The problem is Elon's impossible promises which everyone takes seriously
Is June going to be enough to reach 5,000/week or whatever they're supposed to be at to become cash flow positive? They've pushed their run rate forecast back 3 times already and they are probably not going to make the current one. They are pretty opaque about their numbers so it's a mystery if they will have enough capital to make it to cash flow positive. It's a big risk right now and it's not clear who will lend them money if they do end up needing a last-second capital raise to get them there.Yes they have, like I said in an earlier post - The last Q call they said they gave themselves a buffer with cash until June.
Yes they have, like I said in an earlier post - The last Q call they said they gave themselves a buffer with cash until June.
Are you saying Elon is dishonest or unrealistic? If the former I have some serious beef with that. If the latter, yeah that's why I like Tesla, they set crazy goals, and eventually get there, instead of making "realistic" excuses why they're not doing it now, and table it for "in 3-5 years".This would be fine if Elon hadn't promised we would be at 10,000 cars a week already or whatever the original forecast was.
The problem isn't the actual run rate, which really is ramping up. The problem is Elon's impossible promises which everyone takes seriously and also the fact that he doesn't seem to have left any room for error in terms of the amount of cash on hand his company is holding to see them through the period where they are ramping up and burning cash and not yet cash flow positive.
Elon set these expectations and people are reacting negatively because they are nowhere near the expectations. He's the CEO of a publicly traded company with shareholders. The same shareholders, mind you, who just approved a compensation package which might be worth $50 to $200 billion if the company is successful beyond anyone's wildest dreams. He needs to learn how to be honest with his shareholders and set realistic expectations and make honest production forecasts. I'm not asking for a lot here, am I?
They tend to bring those in house, if you're a supplier making those, you really don't want to piss off Tesla.Or if the part is Tesla-specific.
So then why are you on here spouting negativity? I gave you the most up-to-date fact from them (and actually I think it was Depak who also chimed in saying this about their buffer timeline, not just Elon) and you are on here posting on assumptions.....They are pretty opaque about their numbers so it's a mystery if they will have enough capital to make it to cash flow positive
Depend on what steady run rate you think they exited Q4 at. Optimistically people think it was 700/wk, many thought it was closer to 500/wk. From 500 to 1500/wk (assuming they don't make any progress this last week in March), they've tripled it in a quarter. One more quarter like this and they're at 4500/wk.Is June going to be enough to reach 5,000/week or whatever they're supposed to be at to become cash flow positive? They've pushed their run rate forecast back 3 times already and they are probably not going to make the current one. They are pretty opaque about their numbers so it's a mystery if they will have enough capital to make it to cash flow positive. It's a big risk right now and it's not clear who will lend them money if they do end up needing a last-second capital raise to get them there.
Depend on what steady run rate you think they exited Q4 at. Optimistically people think it was 700/wk, many thought it was closer to 500/wk. From 500 to 1500/wk (assuming they don't make any progress this last week in March), they've tripled it in a quarter. One more quarter like this and they're at 4500/wk.
a 1-day retool? Is that even possible?
That's a nice feat. If only guidance had been more realistic that would actually feel like a win.Let's take a moment here to look at a forest.
S has been in production a little under 6 years. X for a little over two.
At 300 at day, the Model 3, in production for 9 months, is about to be built at a higher rate.
(yes numbers slightly off)