You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I doubt they prepare for non-PUP before Q2. EU/China will happily consume any "excess" for months to come. Possibly they will start building PUP 35K vehicles but that should be not much more of a change in Fremont than adding MR was to the lineup, just a different battery part variation, and maybe a different motor if they determine that adding another motor to the mix will overall reduce costs by building one that is only as capable as needed. The SR complexity will be mostly in GF1 where they will bring up the new SR module / pack assembly line.
But non-PUP will surely wait until after SR is already shipping for some time.
You don't know that's cars, Vicki could be (and is likely) talking output of her own section only. Having said that, it's encouraging, there would be no point in them getting too much ahead of the overall curve of production.Tesla’s consistently producing 1300+ cars per day lately. That’s over 9,000/week. Hope that news gets out!
Source: a Tesla worker
In terms of the car or the stock ?Perhaps in 5 or 10 years your friends will reflect back on their choices and buy a Tesla then?
Doesn't make much sense to me. No PUP means more manufacturing variation. They're working on margin, so better move more high-spec stuff globally than complicate to move low-demand product in the USA.I was thinking Long Range non-PUP RWD could be added to the lineup for Q1. That should be similar margin to the Mid Range PUP RWD.
I presume the new battery module/pack lines from Grohmann should have arrived at the Gigafactory by now, but it doesn't sound like they plan to ramp them up until late Q1. So i expect Short Range PUP RWD to be released in March/April.
Tesla’s consistently producing 1300+ cars per day lately. That’s over 9,000/week. Hope that news gets out!
5k/week for a whole quarter was mentioned by Moody's as a major condition before a Moody's upgrade of Tesla.
OTI was unaware that Liberia and Myanmar had landed on the moon...
Was Moody's condition of 5k/wk for Model 3 itself or all models together ?*worst-case: since InsideEVs does not count Model 3 deliveries in Canada. Likely about 3-4K total in Oct-Nov 2018, but likely less than Q3 due to expiring US Tax incentives.
My estimate is not that good overall. Multiple sources indicate the production is 5-6k/week (maybe lower 5xxx) in Dec so far, and the Canadian delivery in Oct and Nov was almost for sure less than 3k.Let's run with worst-case* numbers from InsideEVs: Oct 17,750 Nov 18,650. That's 36,400 est'd Model 3s delivered in first 2 mths of Q4 (61 days @ ~600/day).
That leaves 28,400 to go in Dec to reach the 'Moody Goal' of 65,000 total in Q4 (1,000 per week). Assuming half a day off on Christmas Eve, full day off on Christmas and half a day off on New Year's Eve.
That's 29 production days to build 28.4K Model 3s in Dec.
So Dec production requires an average daily rate of less than 1,000 Model 3s per work day during the month. 65K Model 3s in 2018Q4 sounds very do-able and is in fact conservative.
Moody's, we hardly knew ye!
CHE3RS!
*worst-case: since InsideEVs does not count Model 3 deliveries in Canada. Likely about 3-4K total in Oct-Nov 2018, but likely less than Q3 due to expiring US Tax incentives.
P.S. Let's also assume that deliveries==production (I know, weak assumption, but using deliveries to estimate production should be conservative while production is rising).
She has told me to get it several times. Only recently has she turned against it.
She is the boss in the family.
I refer to her as "She who must be obeyed"(Rumpole of the Bailey)
I learned a long time ago to agree with everything she says, no matter what.
It's not a 50/50 marriage. Not even a 90/10.
Was Moody's condition of 5k/wk for Model 3 itself or all models together ?
I share that exact sentiment myself as well - but I'd also like to note that @KarenRei has called out most of her trades this year in advance of making them, and has a very good track record, calling several bottoms and tops.
She is definitely not day trading - she is at most "low intensity swing trading" with months between trades, while neither shorting nor using margin. Several times she has elected not to trade, despite being very close to good entry points - which is the right strategy so few are able to master.
(She also won one of the prestigious IOCCC's with a contest entry abusing a glibc macro bug in a clever way.)
I wish her good luck too, especially in the options space which is an added layer of complexity and emotional baggage to deal with.
Futures looking green for now, let’s hope they stay that way overnight.
Let's run with worst-case* numbers from InsideEVs: Oct 17,750 Nov 18,650. That's 36,400 est'd Model 3s delivered in first 2 mths of Q4 (61 days @ ~600/day).
That leaves 28,400 to go in Dec to reach the 'Moody Goal' of 65,000 total in Q4 (5K/wk*13wks). Let's assume production shutdowns of half a day Christmas Eve, full day on Christmas and half a day on New Year's Eve.
That gives 29 production days to build 28.4K Model 3s in Dec.
So Dec production requires an average daily rate of less than 1,000 Model 3s per work day during the month. 65K Model 3s in 2018Q4 sounds very do-able and is in fact conservative.
Moody's, we hardly knew ye!
CHE3RS!
*worst-case: since InsideEVs does not count Model 3 deliveries in Canada. Likely about 3-4K total in Oct-Nov 2018, but likely less than Q3 due to expiring US Tax incentives.
P.S. Let's also assume that deliveries==production (I know, weak assumption, but using deliveries to estimate production should be conservative while production is rising).
What sources indicate that (other than Troy's spreadsheet)?My estimate is not that good overall. Multiple sources indicate the production is 5-6k/week (maybe lower 5xxx) in Dec so far, and the Canadian delivery in Oct and Nov was almost for sure less than 3k.
One good thing is that there seems to be no day off for holidays, even for Christmas day.
Totally my estimate is 60k, and could be even a little bit lower.
EU is a different charge port, but for most of EU (ignoring right hand drive areas) the hardware is otherwise very similar.how much modification does the lines need for the China/Euro models? Or only software tweak is needed?
For EU, my vague recollection is that there are a number of small requirements such as tail lights, turn signals, emergency lights, etc. $TSLAQ seems to think EU homologation is a potential show-stopper requiring lots of re-engineering, etc. (even though Tesla's quite familiar w/ whatever the requirements are). I'd love to see a parts list diff for S/X if anyone has ...EU is a different charge port, but for most of EU (ignoring right hand drive areas) the hardware is otherwise very similar.
China may be interesting... I think they have two different China-specific standards, one for AC and one for DC (and not a CCS equivalent where the DC is an addon to the AC portion). IIRC the AC standard is basically Type 2, but with the receptacle/cable genders swapped. The DC standard is an entirely separate connector. Tesla does already have adapters for China for existing S/X to the new DC fast charging standard, but for new build S/X destined for China they added a 'fuel door' style flap on the body panel near the usual charging location which contains both of the Chinese standards:
It's possible they shoehorn both into the larger flap area of the Model 3, but I'm not confident there is room.
I would highly, highly recommend not considering InsideEVs to be a "worst case" estimate. This is a bit of a weird quarter -- they could easily be way off based on the methodology they use.