twitter is a cesspit so I'm not wasting time on it, but the quick look only shows that he had a picture, and someone indicating his posting history was anti-Tesla. In particular, the core of his claim is that he was contracted and it wasn't for immediate pickup -- which can be spun however you like. Maybe "real", maybe not. But when the signal to noise ratio is as bad as it is on twitter? For me, its an ignore -- no input either way.
Now, if someone actually has verifiable information that has relevant details rather than vague or generalized statements -- something that is actionable -- then I'm interested