jelloslug
Active Member
This is exactly how TSLA behaves.no im not..but this is very illogical the way stock behaves
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is exactly how TSLA behaves.no im not..but this is very illogical the way stock behaves
Me neither....my lemonade stand/garage sale did not net muchI'd like to remind everyone that there was a bear raid last July 4th weekend and so I predicted another bear raid this July 4th weekend, and that it is playing out exactly as I predicted. If I had dry powder, I would be buying more. (I do not.)
"Promised"? I don't think so.I wouldn't sweat it TT promised 400 by weeks end.
The point you raised (highlighted) is only true if Tesla is fundamentally not profitable. Otherwise there is a level of expansion that can be organically supported by profit from existing products. This is the case that Tesla is trying to prove in Q3 2018 - Q1 2019. We will see soon enough.I think his theory isn't very convincing. As a short one may argue that it's not us, that is trying to starve Teslas access to the capital markets, but Tesla starved it by themselves. You simply can't announce capex of 3+ billion for 2018 with 3.3 billion liquidity on hand, when you know you need 1 billion or so in cash reserves and are not 110%, sure that you'll end the year with a full-year net profit. How is that supposed to work without further reduction of CapEx? Yes, you can reduce CapEx spending, but that slows down your future growth prospects. If your future growth prospects had already been priced in, this may reduce your stock price, which makes a capital raise more expensive, so you can raise less, which slows your future ... the point is: Reflexivity theorie works in both directions.
If you are living in the best of all times (plenty of money searching for investments, low interest rates, first to sell luxury goods in a trending EV market, automotive cycle running longer than usual, subsidised in all major markets) and your company goes broke because a single capital raise goes wrong or you can't repay a certain bond, you company was overleveraged to the teeth. In such a case it's not the fault of some shorts. If your company has a fundamentally sound business, most shorts will simply disappear, since there's no money to be made. If shorts are spreading provable lies, sue them. it may take quite some time until a decision is made, but it's a pretty strong point to make.
"Promised"? I don't think so.
I've told you a million times; "Don't exaggerate."
Hey, watch it with that "Not a Flame Thrower"!
yeah, a electric motor powered toy Dragon probably with a built in mini not flame throwerJust wondering, maybe Elon will have a 4th of July surprise?
Yes, that seems to have been forgotten. Always good to remember; "It ain't over 'til it's over"!Just wondering, maybe Elon will have a 4th of July surprise?
Do you believe?it looks like nobody believes Elon about the coming short burn of the century
I'm not sure if Tesla could've gotten all their stock-based capital from a private raise.imho shorts are already successful because they keep slowing down tsla's growth projection. Imagine tsla is private and without the obligation to satiate the silly short term demands by the "market", it does not need to show short term profits thus no need to slow down investment. The production/market share in 3 years frame will be much higher than the current projection.
Me too. (Well, 321.93.)Broke into my kids piggy bank and bought some more at 322
Check out spaceX:I'm not sure if Tesla could've gotten all their stock-based capital from a private raise.
Just wondering, maybe Elon will have a 4th of July surprise?