You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow. Either Elon just repealed every law of finance, or he's jumped the shark.
So how many of you are buying if the price is sub 380 at market open?
This is simply not true. I wish people were more careful with these kind of statements. There is always a chance the deal does not go through and there is always the chance that the stock price will suffer from it. Just because it worked with SolarCity does not mean it will work in this case.
What does he know we don't that allows him to use the word "never"?
So how many of you are buying if the price is sub 380 at market open?
+13Look, of course - don't take investment advice for a guy on the internet. So none of what I said is advice... BUT: Shorts were going wild over every round of raising capital / issuing bonds / the merger of Solar City. And of course I'm biased. But I'm not aware of any proposal that EM made to the board that was rejected. I'm also not aware of any stockholder proposal that was endorsed by EM+Board that didn't go through. I'm aware of lots of noise around any suggestion thought.
So nothing is a done deal. But we do have a bit of precedence. And if EM says that the financing is lined up... Well, everyone place your bets accordingly.
Well, I asked for other examples he said he can't remember any. He didn't really know about Tesla as a company but said he heard about the intention to go private. I think he simply couldn't imagine how this would work. Keep in mind, the guy is working on Scandinavian stocks in Denmark. I wouldn't put too much into that. I'm more thinking of it as a sentiment that the common man on the street would have vis-a-vis the whole project
Me I already did (in Frankfurt). (not advice, just putting my money where my mouth is).
Yes it would. We just all want to make lots of money for doing next to no work.
I’ve been trying to read back over all the pages I missed this afternoon, and I have seen very little discussion of “financing secured”. This financing seems critical to me but there has been no disclosure by Tesla as to who is providing this financing. Isnt a legal disclosure necessary when a public company secures financing? Or, maybe not when it is under consideration but once it is actually done.
Besides Larry Page, who do we think might provide financing? WS banks are excluded, public companies would have to disclose, so maybe a consortium of private investors who can fly under the radar?
Baird Says Tesla will Smoke the $420 Level.
Tesla will smoke the $420 level, Baird says
We think some shareholders may demand a steeper premium than the $420 mark, and we think shares could move higher as shorts cover and investors demand a higher price to go private,” said analysts Ben Kallo and David Katter, in a note to clients. “We view the risk/reward as extremely favorable at current levels.”
$70 billion would be a lot of private investors - unless it's Buffett, Gates or Bezos or similar you couldn't do it quietly.
You are hereby my first ignored member on this forum.$70 billion would be a lot of private investors - unless it's Buffett, Gates or Bezos or similar you couldn't do it quietly.
A publicly held company may deregister its equity securities when they are held by less than 300 shareholders of record or less than 500 shareholders of record, where the company does not have significant assets. Depending on the facts and circumstances, the company may no longer be required to file periodic reports with the SEC once the number of shareholders of record drops below the above thresholds.
$70 billion would be a lot of private investors - unless it's Buffett, Gates or Bezos or similar you couldn't do it quietly.
if you believe in tesla’s ability to perform, then it doesn’t matter if they’re public or private.
FWIW, everyone saying that Tesla wouldn't have to report financials after going private...
SEC.gov | Going Private
Given what Tesla's doing with allowing shareholders to stay on board, there's going to be a lot more than 300 shareholders of record. Which would mean that Tesla isn't actually going private, in SEC terminology, and would be required to report normally?
That would imply to me that this is more of a... stock buyback plus NASDAQ delisting (which would mean that Tesla would still end up on the OTC markets I think)?
Excuse my ignorance, but wouldn't the amount of capital required be much lower than this?
The cash injection into the company when they go private only has to be equal to the amount of people who want to cash in their shares?
So, lets say that is 50% of retail investors (who own $7b of stock) and 20% of investor funds (who own $20b of stock). That would mean Elon would need to find $8-10billion of cash. Something that Apple, Google, Softback, the Saudis etc could do easily