Krugerrand
Meow
Show me a single example of Elon saying this in the past.
Screw it! We’ll build our own Gigafactory. True story.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Show me a single example of Elon saying this in the past.
Because we are in the U.S. where free speech is guaranteed. So people can express opinions freely. Whether you agree or not is irrelevant. You are free to render your opposing view if the press will air or print it. Give it a try.
Uh, WHAT options are expensive? Call premium has literally cratered. One can buy an Oct 275$ for 2%, an oct 300$ for LESS than .5%. That's HALF of 1%. Compared to recent history, this is NOTHING.I have a feeling that this thing is bottoming out, I don't see it falling through 52 weeks low. But maybe I am wrong, because options are still crazy expensive
For crying out loud - The Economist is one of the most credible publications, period, and has been extremely positive about Tesla in the past. I've been reading it for nearly 3 decades, your comment is without merit. If you paint every new outlet that is remotely critical or even simply skeptical of Tesla as 'not credible', you'll spend your life in a fan boy echo chamber.
Comments like yours would make anyone who hasn't read the article think it's some scathing attack on Tesla or Elon Musk. it's actually not - it simply says something we've all known for a while, which is Tesla could do with a very strong "nuts and bolts" COO who can oversee production, so Musk can focus on product development (quote from the Economist "He [Musk] is a brilliant product developer".
Additionally The Economist was practically the only publication to actually report that Musk had indeed agreed a plan with the Sovereign Wealth Fund, but did not have paperwork with bankers to back it up to the SEC. Almost no other serious publication said that.
bought more just now at 251. I am invested deep now. I hope the market is green tomorrow.
Absolutely not. He's repetitive, annoying, and paid-to-post. Frankly you're sus as well.I maybe asking for trouble here but let me vouch for beachbum77 dispite of the fact I disagree with him all the time. It is important to hear the other side of the argument when it is presented in a calm and elaborative manner. he present the complete argument most of the time, unlike some troll who just repeat stupid sound bites.
AMZN has increased by a factor of 4x during the same time period.
I have the car and I'm all for saving the world but I also need to think of my own retirement. At some point I will need to cut my losses and abandon my stake in TSLA. Elon is welcome to keep tweeting all he wants, I'm waiting in theory through Q3 and maybe Q4 results and if nothing happens to SP it will be time to close my position and walk away.
I'm not running a charity and Elon has not shown he cares one bit about his investors and I'm tired on the dirty game being played to destroy the company. It's not fun and the last 2 years it never has been. I could have just quietly invested in evil instead and made 4x returns in the time good has yielded nothing. That's the bottom line, evil always wins because good is dumb. Just look at the Kavanaugh saga.
1 year is a pretty short timeline...anything can happen(globally,Twitter explosion etc.) If Tesla makes it through the next year, 10 banger in 10 years is on...but again much can happen over the next year.I'm 26 years old and from Istanbul. As I've repeated on my previous posts; I've put whatever I've made and put on the side to TSLA. Most of the extra money that I managed to put to aside was made by Tesla or EV related businesses. (I'm an EV/Tesla vlogger and community's founder in the country)
I bought in I think more than a month ago at 275$. Sold at 302$ to switch brokers. Luckily the SEC dip happened when I was still transferring the money between brokerages. Then I bought in again at 270$. It was all fun and games when agreeing with SEC pushed us all the way to 316. I didn't put a stop loss either since I am long but now it is starting to look worrisome.
I'm not going to need this money for at least 12 months so I don't care about short term. Even if I lose everything and TSLAQ really becomes a reality I don't care about losing my money on something I so deeply believe in. As long as it doesn't happen due to reckless behavior of Tesla's C level executives. (*cough* Elon)
People always criticize this 'cult' and I agree there are some edge cases here and there that make us look creepy but overall what sticks us together are these fantastic products and the vision we see. Tesla's mission of 'accelerating the advent to sustainable transport' is already complete. So we should focus on what Tesla's competitive advantages are. Elon always says what makes a company competitive is their pace of innovation. Protecting your leadership by patents, lawsuits or being the first to market is destined to fail. So I'm excited to see what they have up their sleeves in the coming days. Something tells me tricks the size/impact of old era might be over but we never know. Here's to hoping Tesla becoming the next VW, not next GM or Ford. (from the European POV of American cars)
If the SP price stays depressed for too long, it will become a retention issue.
I get almost a heart attack every time a tweet from Elon comes in
Where’s the retweet button? The Economist is the gold standard. I don’t know if it’s Rothschild owned, but it’s been solid for a long time and the Rothschild’s have held on to their wealth for a 1000 years, so that’s street cred to some people.For crying out loud - The Economist is one of the most credible publications, period, and has been extremely positive about Tesla in the past. I've been reading it for nearly 3 decades, your comment is without merit. If you paint every news outlet that is remotely critical or even simply skeptical of Tesla as 'not credible', you'll spend your life in a fan boy echo chamber.
Comments like yours would make anyone who hasn't read the article think it's some scathing attack on Tesla or Elon Musk. it's actually not - it simply says something we've all known for a while, which is Tesla could do with a very strong "nuts and bolts" COO who can oversee production, so Musk can focus on product development (quote from the Economist "He [Musk] is a brilliant product developer".
Additionally The Economist was practically the only publication to actually report that Musk had indeed agreed a plan with the Sovereign Wealth Fund, but did not have paperwork with bankers to back it up to the SEC. Almost no other serious publication said that.
David Einhorn is a hedge fund manager. Is he not subject to the same rules as Musk? Can he not run afoul of the SEC in the same way? Should longs file a complaint, could we?Stating that Musk has deceived on the numbers isn't an opinion, it's a statement of fact. If that statement is objectively false, it's libelous.
Pray tell, how is the Rothschild reference relevant?The Economist (part of the Rothschild syndicate) is not credible and is happy to keep the world enslaved to the banker class.
Ford, an Automaker at a Crossroads, Seeks Cuts and Partners
Ford dying.
Not a matter of IF but WHEN.
Ford should take whatever money they have left and invest in Tesla.
Marrying Tesla batteries and drivetrains to F150's may not be completely efficient and optimal at the start. However, it would be an amazing stop gap until they can jointly produce a truck built around EV technology.
The Economist (part of the Rothschild syndicate) is not credible and is happy to keep the world enslaved to the banker class.
Uh, WHAT options are expensive? Call premium has literally cratered. One can buy an Oct 275$ for 2%, an oct 300$ for LESS than .5%. That's HALF of 1%. Compared to recent history, this is NOTHING.
Even heading out to Nov to capture earnings, premium at 300$ is 2.25%..that's nothing, it's less than a 4th of the price it was a couple months ago. If one is bullish, options are the absolute best place to buy, but one has to be really bullish at this point.
If that 300$ gets down to 2%, it's probably a decent roll of the dice, but I find the option markets better at predicting future pricing that SP, so having it hit is going to be a long shot - if the indication is correct.
Could also be a lottery ticket, but I rarely play the lottery.
Perfect, shoot straight for the Nazi slur when you don't like the message. Godwin is waving.Not only does that sound incredibly stupid, I'm also not aware of any version of a 'Rothschild syndicate' conspiracy that is not extremely anti-semitic.. so theres that.
But there is the possibility you give your cat Lysergic Acid.
I haven't read the article(link?), but from what you're saying here, it seems like he already has that in Jerome as President of Automotive. Why would he need yet another person to do the same task?
No, not clear at all. But indeed, this is not the place. Nor is any other place.This is not the place for such a discussion, but looking at the controlling financial interest should make it clear enough. It's sad to here so many think these people are docile money-changers. I know I know, call me a conspiracy theorist.