What? I'm still confused.
How are you confused? Tesla storage projects are part of Tesla Energy. Tesla Energy is part of Tesla Inc. Why is this confusing?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What? I'm still confused.
Yes.Dumb question... Is the Megapack made by the Tesla that we theoretically own a part of as TSLA stockholders, and it's success therefore adds to my stock value?
No.Or is the Megapack made by a Tesla division the success of which does not directly affect my stock value?
Huh? A what A what?I was just... um, AFAF...
OT
Differences are good. That's what makes us unique. If we were all the same, life would be pretty boring.
In Canada, all major financial institutions use M for thousand and MM for million. We can thank the Romans for that.
Here we go, the Megapack is indeed Mega!
(...) Tesla is listing the project as having a total capacity of 1,200 MWh, which would mean that each Megapack has a capacity of 2,673 kWh. (...) The total capacity of those 449 Megapacks represents more energy capacity than Tesla Energy deployed throughout its first 3 years of operation – all Powerpacks and Powerwalls combined. (...)
Tesla’s new Megapack to debut at giant energy storage project in California
... I cannot wait for the moment Wall Street finally wakes up and considered TE as a part of Tesla they need to add to their assessment....
Hi Jim, IMHO, your current play isn't really swing trading; its day trading.
Weekend OT, just one data point:
Austria, reserved Feb. 2017, ordered today. Delivery Feb.2019.
I never bough a new car before, I never spend more than 17k on a car before. Now I'm in with LR AWD, red, FSD...
Weekend OT, just one data point:
Austria, reserved Feb. 2017, ordered today. Delivery Feb.2019.
I never bough a new car before, I never spend more than 17k on a car before. Now I'm in with LR AWD, red, FSD...
Elon MuskVerified account @elonmusk 6m6 minutes ago
Tesla is releasing all vehicles for sale today where original customer can’t take delivery before end of year. Reminder to US buyers that $7500 tax credit drops in half in 2 weeks. Order online http://Tesla.com or visit stores.
Asking for a friend.Huh? A what A what?
The exact car doesn't matter. The people will still get their car next year. Tesla is doing the right thing by getting cars to people who can take them while 7,500 is in play. Alternative is people who can take cars now, don't get one and Tesla has more inventory overhang. No one benefits from that scenario.Do I understand correctly that he is saying they don´t deliver theses cars to the people that originally ordered them and giving them to others who can take delivery more quickly instead? Some people are going to be pissed I guess... But a good way to make money in the short term.
where original customer can’t take delivery before end of year
Do I understand correctly that he is saying they don´t deliver theses cars to the people that originally ordered them and giving them to others who can take delivery more quickly instead? Some people are going to be pissed I guess... But a good way to make money in the short term.
Maybe that corresponds to the "secret" that the truck driver tweeted about (discussed above)?
If they can't take delivery before EOY Tesla has time to produce them within the last week of the year or the first week of next year. That's 12000 cars. Noone will be pissed....
We are talking about Tesla loaners, display cars, and test drive vehicles being released so that Tesla salespeople can offer them to customers.
Though Musk specifically said that it’s only “where original customers can’t take delivery before the end of the year.”
Sources say that Tesla still has some significant number of vehicles in inventory at some delivery hubs, especially the new Model 3 Mid-Range.
My take is they are selling at a loss. They've priced it cheaper than the price in their home market by about $3K. That makes no sense financially since they have to ship each Kona here first before they can sell it. Unlike Tesla, existing manufacturers can afford to sell EVs at a loss, at-least temporarily and at low volumes like they are doing here.
But their higher trims won't be $15k more.The first thing to note is that that is for the base version of the car. Pricing for other trim levels to be released later. (Just like the price for the base Model 3 is $35k.) How many base Kona's are they going to actually make? They are probably planning for most people to take an upgraded trim level.
If they can't take delivery before EOY Tesla has time to produce them within the last week of the year or the first week of next year. That's 12000 cars. Noone will be pissed....
You've spent $17k on a car before? Meh. I've never spent more than $5k on a car before.
If Tesla can pry open my pocketbook, they can pry open anyone's
That’s very interesting. Fred glosses over the even bigger story that it is Tesla who will be supplying the 1.2 GWh batteries for the Vistra project. To my knowledge the battery supplier for the Vistra project was not previously reported.
If Fred is correct that Tesla will be building the Vistra battery, that would mean that Tesla will be providing batteries for two GWh-scale projects for PG&E — the 1.2GWh Vistra project referred to in the Electrek article and the separate project PG&E will own of 730-1095 MWh.
Those two batteries are currently expected to be the two largest in the world when completed (deadline 12/2020 for each). Storage will replace 3 California gas plants as PG&E nabs approval for world's largest batteries