Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Under the new Frunk.

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I had that exact fear! That's why I designed an opener with a sensor that my m3 uses to only open the door. if the door is already open, nothing happens.

Some openers do actually have discrete open and close commands (including my own) but for some reason the homelink module in the m3 doesn't properly learn those codes. So I made my own.
Do you mind to share details?
My Homelink is acting up, sending sometimes a double signal, causing the garage door stops right after its starting opening process. Tesla refuses to fix since it is intermittent.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Nickage87
Do you mind to share details?
My Homelink is acting up, sending sometimes a double signal, causing the garage door stops right after its starting opening process. Tesla refuses to fix since it is intermittent.
This is not remote or tesla issue. You need to recalibrate the door, I installed my garage door opener month ago and it was acting like this until I recalibrated it. Safety systems has to be properly configured as well, door must go back if you place 2*4 wood piece under it when it is closing, at the same time door should not close if there is cardboard box large enough to block safery sensors. I suggest you to find manual online for your opener and go through all safety steps
 
Do you mind to share details?
My Homelink is acting up, sending sometimes a double signal, causing the garage door stops right after its starting opening process. Tesla refuses to fix since it is intermittent.

I can do that but it might take a bit for a full write up. But the summary is I ended up using this receiver:

https://www.amazon.com/eMylo-Wirele...0&sr=1-1-25b07e09-600a-4f0d-816e-b06387f8bcf1

along with this magnetic sensor:

https://www.amazon.com/SM-226L-3Q-S...ge+door+magnetic+sensor&qid=1601388550&sr=8-5

I bought that magnetic sensor because it has both normally open (no) and normally closed (nc) magnetic switches. I needed the nc option for the initial attempt that didn't work out. The final solution required a no switch which should be cheaper. But is actually a pretty nice, well made switch.
 
This is not remote or tesla issue. You need to recalibrate the door, I installed my garage door opener month ago and it was acting like this until I recalibrated it. Safety systems has to be properly configured as well, door must go back if you place 2*4 wood piece under it when it is closing, at the same time door should not close if there is cardboard box large enough to block safery sensors. I suggest you to find manual online for your opener and go through all safety steps

maybe. the safety sensors usually only work when the door is closing, not opening. Think about it - if you pull in while the door is still opening, you wouldn't want the door to reverse direction...
 
maybe. the safety sensors usually only work when the door is closing, not opening. Think about it - if you pull in while the door is still opening, you wouldn't want the door to reverse direction...
It says the door stops not reverses. When opener is being calibrated it measures force its needs to operate, if force to pull the door is higher to what it was calibrated, the opener will think pulley hit the end of the track or some other obstacle.
 
Does anybody know what the heck all those components are?
Seems like a lot if plumbing.
I am guessing windshield wiper tank in the middle but thats about it.
That tank in the middle is coolant that is used to cool the battery pack, motor/s, and ICE (infotainment + autopilot computers). There are lines running to all those components plus the condenser in the front (that's a radiator underneath the big black rectangular plastic shroud in the very front of the car). The windshield washer fluid reservoir is mostly hidden by the firewall in the front left of the driver (follow the filler down).

Here's a good video that explains the cooling system (non-heatpump version that all current production Model 3s have)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ncinc99
Personally, if Homelink hadn't been included when I bought the car I would have skipped it and installed a full wifi enable module for the garage door instead. Homelink is kinda crap anyway, as it doesn't know whether the door is open or closed - just send a signal to toggle whatever state it's in. I've since installed Tailwind and it's much nicer, including the ability to set "night time" so that it always makes sure the garage door(s) are closed.
What is Tailwind ? Where can I find it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cdswm3
It's much more efficient. In other words, less lost range in cold weather.

Tesla Model Y has a heat pump for consistent range in cold climates - Electrek

Within ideal temperatures, sure. Below about 10 degrees, not so much. And I’m curious to see how it does below zero. Heat pumps are usually not overly effective at such temperatures and in fact, usually need to be supplemented.

All that said - while range is important, I care more about cabin temperature when it’s super cold out. I don’t travel all that far in the dead of winter - but wherever I go, I want to be warm. :)

I’m not yet on the “heat pump is better than PTC in all situations” bandwagon. Hopefully come April 2021, I’ll eat those words!
 
  • Like
Reactions: android04
I’m not yet on the “heat pump is better than PTC in all situations” bandwagon. Hopefully come April 2021, I’ll eat those words!
Here's the COP vs Temperature graph for a fairly standard air source heat pump.
NIBE2020COP.gif

Notice that even at the temperature of -19C/-2F the Coefficient Of Performance or COP is still like 1.75. That means you put 100 watts into it, you're getting 175 watts of heat back.
The COP of a PTC heater is 1.0.
In case of heat pumps, the COP is always greater than 1 in accordance with second law of thermodynamics. A more technical answer can be found here. https://www.brighthubengineering.com/hvac/16284-coefficient-of-performance-of-the-heat-pumps/
 
  • Like
Reactions: dmurphy
What is Tailwind ? Where can I find it?

I just installed TailWind last night for both my doors. It is amazing. Ties to the cars Bluetooth and auto opens ans closes the doors as the car approaches and leaves. My phone app controls it and it integrated to Google Home perfectly. Would never buy Homelink now.

Use the discount code SHIP4LESS to get a discounted shipping rate.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Murky-Article
Here's the COP vs Temperature graph for a fairly standard air source heat pump.
View attachment 594165
Notice that even at the temperature of -19C/-2F the Coefficient Of Performance or COP is still like 1.75. That means you put 100 watts into it, you're getting 175 watts of heat back.
The COP of a PTC heater is 1.0.
In case of heat pumps, the COP is always greater than 1 in accordance with second law of thermodynamics. A more technical answer can be found here. https://www.brighthubengineering.com/hvac/16284-coefficient-of-performance-of-the-heat-pumps/

There's a tremendous difference between ideal COP and actual COP. We're getting real deep in the weeds, but real-world performance in subfreezing temperature has always been a challenge for heat pumps. Essentially - there's nowhere to pull the heat from, when the ambient is so cold. (Don't forget the energy used for the defrost cycle, for one.) Would be curious to see what the balance point is for the Model Y's heat pump.

Air-Source Heat Pump or Air-to-Air Heat Pump | EGEE 102: Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection

1272s.jpg
 
Notice that your graph says "modern heat pumps have COP's greater than 1.0 down to -25F." And it's copyrighted 2010.

As long as the COP is greater than 1, it is more efficient than a PTC heater. And Tesla has talked about some techniques they're using instead of having a PTC backup heater. I think they thought and engineered this one right.
 
  • Love
Reactions: dmurphy
Notice that your graph says "modern heat pumps have COP's greater than 1.0 down to -25F." And it's copyrighted 2010.

As long as the COP is greater than 1, it is more efficient than a PTC heater. And Tesla has talked about some techniques they're using instead of having a PTC backup heater. I think they thought and engineered this one right.

I'm sure it won't suck ... and I'm sure Tesla really engineered the hell out of it - but anything that means a less-warm-or-less-quick-to-warm cabin than today will meet spousal disapproval... Again, based on my limited experience with heat pumps, I haven't been a fan. Let Tesla make me a believer! One winter cycle should tell the story.

I'm totally good if I'm singing out of an old songbook here. Just color me in the "skeptical till I see it" category.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cdswm3