TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Wait for sport/performance option?

Discussion in 'Model S' started by Mycroft, Jun 25, 2011.

?

Waiting for sport/performance option?

  1. Screw it, just get me a sedan!

    69.6%
  2. Need sport option.

    6.3%
  3. Dunno. Going to wait for options to be announced.

    24.1%
  1. Mycroft

    Mycroft Life happens

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,592
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    For those wanting a Model S, are you needing the sport/performance option?
     
  2. dsm363

    dsm363 Roadster + Sig Model S

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    18,220
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    I would love to get a sport model but if they don't offer it at launch, it probably won't be for another year before they get around to it. I really don't see why it can't be done at launch or included with the Signature Series (maybe as an option).
     
  3. Mycroft

    Mycroft Life happens

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,592
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    I'm sure hoping the option is there at launch. That would be so awesome!

    If I could have the Roadster too, then the regular 300 mile sedan would be fine for me. But sans Roadster, I want some juice!
     
  4. kgb

    kgb Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    605
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Depends, depends, depends. Depends on how much, how fast, and what else is on the market. Right now, I am leasing the Roadster until I buy the Model S, but... I might just switch out the (2nd car) Lexus LS460 for the Model S, and keep the Roadster until they have a Model S "Sport." But all those decisions depend on what the marketplace looks like at the time I need to make the decision.
     
  5. richkae

    richkae VIN587

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,917
    You need a faster 0-60 than 5.6 seconds?
    I have never seen a sport option defined.
    What exactly is it that you want in a sport/performance option?
     
  6. Mycroft

    Mycroft Life happens

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,592
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    More! :biggrin:
     
  7. Mycroft

    Mycroft Life happens

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,592
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    From the poll so far, it looks like the majority is happy with 5.6 seconds. And frankly, if the test drive come February WOWs me, then I agree, the sport package may not be that important.
     
  8. Norbert

    Norbert TSLA will win

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,424
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    February?
     
  9. Mycroft

    Mycroft Life happens

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,592
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    Why not? A good a guess as any.
     
  10. TEG

    TEG TMC Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    17,171
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
  11. Norbert

    Norbert TSLA will win

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,424
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
  12. Eberhard

    Eberhard #421 Model S #S32

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,140
    Location:
    Germany
    #12 Eberhard, Jun 26, 2011
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2011
    The easiest way for a sport is a smaller drivetrain in the front (150kW is enough) for better recuperation while offering 4-Wheel drive. This drivetrain could be used later in the bluestar model.
     
  13. richkae

    richkae VIN587

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,917
    #13 richkae, Jun 26, 2011
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2011
    I don't think that developing another drivetrain and the system to control 2 of them would necessarily qualify as the easiest. That sounds complex to me.

    In the Roadster acceleration is PEM/motor limited until about 50mph, above that it is battery power limited.

    If the Model S is similar, then there isnt a lot of extra battery power for the 2nd drivetrain except below 50mph, so just adding another one may not improve performance at all above 50mph.
    I am completely happy with Roadster 0-50, its the 50-100 that needs improving to run with supercars.

    Adding a 2nd powertrain will give you the AWD you want, but its not clear that it is the best path to improved performance.
    The extra weight just hurts you when you are battery limited.

    The "easiest" way to improve performance is to reduce the weight of the car. That improves performance at every speed.
     
  14. jkirkebo

    jkirkebo Model S P85+ VIN 14420 EU

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    947
    Location:
    Fredrikstad, Norway
    The 300-mile battery is 70% bigger than the Roadster-battery, so theoretically it should be able to prove about 70% more power too. That is just about exactly 150kW...
     
  15. Eberhard

    Eberhard #421 Model S #S32

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,140
    Location:
    Germany
    by adding AWD you increase the acceleration within the lower speed-range (up to 50mph). the roadster has a 1/3 front 2/3 rear, this helps a lot for single drive. Hope, Model S is better balanced like 45%/55%. Then only AWD helps to improve acceleration.
     
  16. dsm363

    dsm363 Roadster + Sig Model S

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    18,220
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    No one needs anything that fast of course but no one needs the Roadster's speed too. I just think it would be a smart thing financially for Tesla to offer it at launch as an option. Would be a lot of fun too.
     
  17. Adm

    Adm Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,032
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    While there is a market for a Model S sport or AWD, I think Tesla would be wise to keep it simple and first get "standard" Model S production going in a reliable fashion. It will be tough enough to get that right time wise but also financially. Let's remember this is Tesla's second model and the first one coming of a production line.
     
  18. smorgasbord

    smorgasbord Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,379
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    Range.


    300 miles is OK, but doesn't get you from San Francisco to Los Angeles (need 400 for that).

    Once you get to 500, Range Anxiety becomes as extinct as a Dodo bird.
    Once you get to 600 you don't even have to worry about a quick charging infrastructure and the whole hybrid thing will have fulfilled its technology bridge purpose.
     
  19. Mycroft

    Mycroft Life happens

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,592
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    I agree smorgasbord, once the range is 500 and the price is < $40k, we're going to see a revolution.

    For me, 300 is a nice sweet spot. On the rare occasions that we need more than that, perhaps once a year, I know several people who would love to trade cars for that period. :biggrin:
     
  20. richkae

    richkae VIN587

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,917
    The 2011 Corvette ZR1 is RWD with 51% front / 49% rear and has a 3.4 second 0-60 with ridiculous 335 width rear tires.
    The BMW 550i is RWD 50/50 and has a 4.8 second 0-60 with little 275 width tires in the back.
    The Lexus LFA is RWD 48/52 and has a 3.6 second 0-60 with 305 width rear tires.

    Having more weight on the drive wheels helps you get maximum traction out of your tires, so you can accelerate hard with smaller tires, but I dont think it is necessary at all to have AWD to improve the 0-60 time.

    Of course AWD will give you better acceleration when wet and your tires cannot achieve maximum traction, and it helps you corner hard on a racetrack.
     

Share This Page