Truck buyers don’t want the CyberTruck.Truck buyers don’t want RWD trucks
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Truck buyers don’t want the CyberTruck.Truck buyers don’t want RWD trucks
It depends. If you re talking about the truck buyers who actually use their truck for work, they won’t even touch CT. If you are talking about F-150 buyers who like to show off, they would consider it.Truck buyers don’t want the CyberTruck.
Nope. The pavement princess truck crowd is very staunchly anti EV.It depends. If you re talking about the truck buyers who actually use their truck for work, they won’t even touch CT. If you are talking about F-150 buyers who like to show off, they would consider it.
What an uninformed opinion. So what does a "truck" do that the Cybertruck doesn't?All of those trucks actually function as trucks. The Cybertruck does not. It’s a toy.
Nope. The pavement princess truck crowd is very staunchly anti EV.
Cybertruck buyers are mostly Tesla/Elon zealots, influencers, and celebrities. Probably never had a truck before.
I’m sure there are a handful of examples otherwise but there’s not going to be a lot of ICE truck buyers, whether fleet or personal use, that are going to a Cybertruck. Maybe F150 Lightning, Silverado EV, or the upcoming Ram REV.
The bed is tiny, and the design makes it impossible to get anything in or out of.What an uninformed opinion. So what does a "truck" do that the Cybertruck doesn't?
Oh yeah, haul a 4x8 piece of plywood laying down in the bed. Whoops, never mind, many pickup "trucks" don't even do that anymore!
The bed is tiny, and the design makes it impossible to get anything in or out of.
Range is massively disappointing, doubly or triply so when towing, which effectively rules it out as a practical tow vehicle. A fifth wheel is an impossibility, although I doubt many people are clamoring for that given the abysmal towing range.
Off-road capabilities are embarrassing to nonexistent.
It is not a serious truck. It’s a toy. Even if it was actually functional as a truck, the looks immediately rule out ~80+% of people who would otherwise be interested. The whole thing is a boondoggle, and the number of people willing to pay $80-120k to be in on the joke is shrinking by the minute.
Sure thing.The Cybertruck may not be your cup of tea, but it is in the opposite corner from being conceded a toy.
Was that with the tailgate open? I lay down in a CT the other day and barely fit in it although it was hard to tell exactly where my feet were.What an uninformed opinion. So what does a "truck" do that the Cybertruck doesn't?
Oh yeah, haul a 4x8 piece of plywood laying down in the bed. Whoops, never mind, many pickup "trucks" don't even do that anymore!
I don’t know what trucks you’re talking about.What an uninformed opinion. So what does a "truck" do that the Cybertruck doesn't?
Oh yeah, haul a 4x8 piece of plywood laying down in the bed. Whoops, never mind, many pickup "trucks" don't even do that anymore!
There's much truth to that.Nope. The pavement princess truck crowd is very staunchly anti EV.
Cybertruck buyers are mostly Tesla/Elon zealots, influencers, and celebrities. Probably never had a truck before.
I’m sure there are a handful of examples otherwise but there’s not going to be a lot of ICE truck buyers, whether fleet or personal use, that are going to a Cybertruck. Maybe F150 Lightning, Silverado EV, or the upcoming Ram REV.
There's much truth to that.
Given the charging infrastructure, it's difficult to take a CT one way to remote areas (mountains, deserts) let alone tow/haul something to have fun once you get there.
The CT's small battery and $16k+ bed swallowing range extender was a pig-and-a-poke rug pull for many on the waitlist.
Some here will get defensive about this, but it's absolutely true.EV trucks need to be promoted as Sports Trucks period. There is a market for that, where they can be compared to the Shelby F-150's of the world. The problem right now is all these EV trucks are being promoted as alternative to ICE trucks and the only one that comes to close to that is the Pro F-150 Lightning, which then gets slapped around by the ICE STX $35k F-150.
The CT and Lightning need to go the Sports Truck route. The CT already has most if not all the components it needs as a sports truck. The whole off road cos-play isn't working. The Lightning has a lot of work to do. Rivian is the only truck that I believe can compete with ICE Trucks like the Tacoma, Ranger and Colorado.
Some here will get defensive about this, but it's absolutely true.
CT works great to haul around town, fast, high ride, maybe the smoothest ride of all trucks on the market (definitely the best riding Tesla), but it can't and won't be good at towing. It may be good at off-roading, but it's not best in class or even close.
It's a great commuter vehicle that can carry stuff...and there's a version that is really fast.
It's fine to be that.
“Commuting” in a 6,000 pound monstrosity is equally bizarre.This whole "off road" trend is bizarre.