You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Many many years.. they have to trickle down to the S & X architecture first.Juniper
The benefit to using 48v architecture in the redesigned Y would be to get to economies of scale on all the electrical components currently being produced for the cybertruck. By adding the new architecture to the Y would immediately lower costs for both the Y and the Cybertruck. Tesla engineered the switch as part of the Cybertruck development and the architecture will now be rolled out as quickly as possible.It was easy to do it on the Cybertruck because it was all new.
To do that on an existing model would require a complete ground up redesign of every single electrical component.
The benefit in 48v vs 12v is reduced wire size which reduces cost and weight. I don’t think the cost of a ground up electrical redesign would be worth the savings in wiring cost, and especially not worth doing for something without any tangible benefits to the end user. You would have no way to tell a car is 12V or 48V without someone else telling you or looking at the low voltage battery specs.
I don't agree. They need to get to large scale production of the new components. Using this architecture in the Y will reduce cost for Y and reduce component costs. Now that they have completed the engineering they will be able to implement the architecture fairly easily when they redesign existing models and build new models.Many many years.. they have to trickle down to the S & X architecture first.
By adding the new architecture to the Y would immediately lower costs for both the Y and the Cybertruck.
Part of why the Y is less expensive and more profitable is because of all the shared components with the 3. If they move the Y to 48V and not the 3 at the same time, they lose that economies of scale for all the components. And they have just redesigned a bunch of electrical stuff for the Highland, they’re not going to ditch all of that and completely start over in just a year.The benefit to using 48v architecture in the redesigned Y would be to get to economies of scale on all the electrical components currently being produced for the cybertruck. By adding the new architecture to the Y would immediately lower costs for both the Y and the Cybertruck. Tesla engineered the switch as part of the Cybertruck development and the architecture will now be rolled out as quickly as possible.
Why do people always ask questions like this here? No one here knows, only Tesla knows. You might as well ask when will FSD be feature complete or when are you going to win the lottery. lolNow that the Cybertruck is shipping I’m curious when the 48v low voltage system will be incorporated into the Model Y. Are we talking months (Juniper?) or years?
Why do people always ask questions like this here? No one here knows, only Tesla knows.
I’m curious when the 48v low voltage system will be incorporated into the Model Y.
It’s a valid question for car geeks. But While 48v is awesome from an engineering perspective, it doesn’t affect user experience.Why do people always ask questions like this here? No one here knows, only Tesla knows. You might as well ask when will FSD be feature complete or when are you going to win the lottery. lol
Not safe to assume S/X get it first. Tesla doesn’t prioritize that wayMany many years.. they have to trickle down to the S & X architecture first.
It’s a valid question for car geeks. But While 48v is awesome from an engineering perspective, it doesn’t affect user experience.
12V parts are everywhere and plentiful and therefore already price stabilized. 48V parts aren’t going to be cheaper than 12V.When parts supplies price stabilizes it does affect cost, which most buyers car about.
Also, for some 3rd party accessories it matters
Also, for some 3rd party accessories it matters