You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOLZ @ $39K pricing. And a bunch of other things in that chart.They are not equivalent, but two completely different trucks, the Rivian looks like the $23K Ford Maverick and the CT is something completely different with a longer wheel base, better range and more powerful towing capacity.
I saw a Rivian in person and wanted to like it, but the front fascia expression with those fetal alcohol syndrome headlights remind me of an unnamed crazy person, combined with the diminutive stature of the truck and no charging infrastructure and I just couldn't do it.
View attachment 873625
I agree, Teslas and Toyotas have about the same build quality, but that has served me well for the last couple of decades. I have never been stranded by a Tesla or a Toyota. A lot of that cash comes from George Soros with over 20M shares in Rivian stock.Just went to a Rivian hub and the quality of the Rivians make the Teslas feel like Toyotas.
Rivian has something like 14.5B cash on hand so having a negative year is not bad. Also compared to Tesla at the same time Rivian I believe had more cash and did not get govt aid in tarp funds.
I agree with you on Rivian's existence as a plus. And With the assessment of CT having rock like seats and half a steering wheel. But what's useless about the CT's bed? Not heard any negatives on that until now.Rivian exist, the CT is still a prototype
.....
Basically, if you want to live with a nice interior and purpose built truck get the Rivian. If you want a plain interior with rock like seats, half a steering wheel, with a useless bed get the CT.
The Rivian is already shipping. I have had a Cybertruck reservation since 2018 and don't expect to see a delivery until 2024. The features on the CT make the term "equivalent" meaningless. Some features I think I will see on the CT are, four wheel steering, steer by wire, more efficient brakes with even better integration with regenerative braking and other features to be announced. Rivian is still in the birthing stages like Tesla was ten years ago so that is also a factor I will weigh if the CT gets delayed beyond 2024 for me.Will the dual motor CT beat the equivalent version from Rivian to market? I have an order in for a CT and Rivian.
The Rivian is already shipping. I have had a Cybertruck reservation since 2018 and don't expect to see a delivery until 2024. The features on the CT make the term "equivalent" meaningless. Some features I think I will see on the CT are, four wheel steering, steer by wire, more efficient brakes with even better integration with regenerative braking and other features to be announced. Rivian is still in the birthing stages like Tesla was ten years ago so that is also a factor I will weigh if the CT gets delayed beyond 2024 for me.
It really comes down to your use case, if you need a mail crawler, get the Rivian, it looks it will handle that really well and should be pretty easy to throw a couple strollers in the back in that 4.5 foot bed with 1500 lbs of payload capacity. It's probably pretty good off road, but that aluminum body will get beat to crap where I would take it.
For my use case, I want something a little more rugged, the cold rolled stainless steel and 16" of ground clearance is very appealing then add in a 6+ foot bed for all my toys and 3500 lbs of payload capacity, just seems to fit better with my lifestyle. I'm carrying cords of wood, going off-road, hunting, surf fishing, and I need something that can get from DC to Southwestern Virginia to my family property without a ton of charging stops.
I’ve done a ton of off-roading the last close to 50 years. Grew up in Northern Nevada on pretty much a subsistence diet, humvees in the sand box, going on 13 years in Alaska. Over the last 30 years my off road rigs where a triple locked 80 series Land Cruiser on 34’s, a g500, and my current rig of going on 10 years a 200 series on 34’s.I've never owned/driven a Model 3 or a Prius, but I did a lot of off-roading with a custom built Toyota for the last fifteen years, and before that travelled all over the world driving all kinds of off road vehicles during my military career.
It really comes down to your use case, if you need a mail crawler, get the Rivian, it looks it will handle that really well and should be pretty easy to throw a couple strollers in the back in that 4.5 foot bed with 1500 lbs of payload capacity. It's probably pretty good off road, but that aluminum body will get beat to crap where I would take it.
For my use case, I want something a little more rugged, the cold rolled stainless steel and 16" of ground clearance is very appealing then add in a 6+ foot bed for all my toys and 3500 lbs of payload capacity, just seems to fit better with my lifestyle. I'm carrying cords of wood, going off-road, hunting, surf fishing, and I need something that can get from DC to Southwestern Virginia to my family property without a ton of charging stops.
One of my favorite off road vehicles... the LMTV War Pig.
View attachment 873984,
U.S. Army Special Forces soldiers with the 5th Special Forces Group in a modified LMTV during Operation Iraqi Freedom. As shown,
much of the original truck's cab has been removed in order to save weight and provide better visibility and arcs of fire.
Agree 100%!!! I would love if Rivian offered even 18” 0r 19” with 35s.I’ve done a ton of off-roading the last close to 50 years. Grew up in Northern Nevada on pretty much a subsistence diet, humvees in the sand box, going on 13 years in Alaska. Over the last 30 years my off road rigs where a triple locked 80 series Land Cruiser on 34’s, a g500, and my current rig of going on 10 years a 200 series on 34’s.
I don’t think there is any way the CT will be a valid off roader. Let’s face it Tesla designs cars for the SoCal banana belt crowd.
First off like the rivian it will come with large rims (like 20” or 22”) that will greatly hinder its ability, being that tires/wheels are the most important factor off road. What Tesla should do is 37’s on 17” rims (like the raptor, TRX, bronco, Jeep,….) but I’m saying no way they will.
Also air suspension…. It is ok on road but sucks off road, Rover, Jeep, Mercedes,… have never been able to do a functional air suspension for off roading and their most capable off roaders (defender (real one not the unibody), Wrangler, G wagon) do not have air.
And let’s face it Tesla does not do traction control all that well. Both my 3 and s sort of wobble along on icy roads, rear slips, flaring motor kicks in, rear slips,…. I have a buddy with an R1T it does much better balancing out the drive.
So the CT vs Rivian off road. Both have (stupid) large rims, both have air, Rivian will probably have a better traction system and the big factor is it has a shorter wheel base. I think when someone pulls the big brakes and can fit a 17” rim on the Rivian it would be a pretty capable off roader.
Rivian exist, the CT is still a prototype
The CT will only be successful because a bunch of first time Truck Tesla fanbois on You Tube will claim it’s the greatest Truck to ever be built….. yet they never driven a truck I their lifetime. Like what happened with the Model 3, a bunch of Prius drivers all of a sudden had a fast car 0-60 and claimed it was the best ever without looking at all the short comings.
Basically, if you want to live with a nice interior and purpose built truck get the Rivian. If you want a plain interior with rock like seats, half a steering wheel, with a useless bed get the CT.