You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SMHWhat bothers me is when when anti-science, gun toting, right wing <insert your favorite word> like O'Reilly, occasionally talk sense it is scary and dangerous.
He didn't change his tune because he now suddenly realized how great Tesla and electric cars are, but only because he realized taking a hard line on this issue does not rhyme well even with his own poorly educated, anti-science, gun toting, bible belt right wing constituents
you do know that the people at msnbc get the daily talking points direct from valerie jarret's office, but that's not politicalAny discussion of Fox News is a political discussion because Fox News is a political organization. The opinions aired on Fox are aimed at subjective political persuasion, not objectively informing the public. Given the organization's Machiavellian operational mode and explicit agenda, it is very difficult to imagine this sudden change of heart on Bill O'Reilly's part re Tesla being authentic or genuine. Based on too many documented years of the Fox methodology, Occam's Razor (not to mention Admiral Ackbar) says, it's a trap and this new warming to Tesla has an agenda behind it. If I had to guess, I'd say, something related to 2014 midterm elections.
SMH
you do know that the people at msnbc get the daily talking points direct from valerie jarret's office, but that's not political
@apvbguy
I would like to add, as I said in another thread, that because of the importance of the USA at global level I dream a transversal Party consisting of both Democrat and Republican people having the same ideas on the issue of EVs and Climate Change/Global Warming.
Democrats want to get off oil for the environment and Republicans for national security. It's about time they realize that wanting the same thing for different reasons is ok and that it's time to get on with it.
Democrats want to get off oil for the environment and Republicans for national security. It's about time they realize that wanting the same thing for different reasons is ok and that it's time to get on with it.
1. SMH means shaking my head@apvbguy
I answered to your post but I am now seeing that it has been replaced by SMH. What does it mean and what happened?
and??? just how would his history of being a trader have any effect on his opinions on BEVs?Don't forget that Eric Bolling was an Oil Futures Trader frequently featured on CNBC before he went to work at FOX.
But why this sudden realization that EVs actually help you get off oil ?
But why this sudden realization that EVs actually help you get off oil ?
3. when I am in Italy I refrain from offering my opinion on the political issues facing the issues in facing the locals because I am not aware of all of the nuances that could be in play
Lol, mkjayakumar, let's see if that survives the censors around here. See we're not adults here and can't be exposed to this.
But why this sudden realization that EVs actually help you get off oil ?
Just saw an interesting piece on FOX news from O'Reilly about Tesla. Bill OReilly: Don’t hate Tesla Motors just because environmentalists are dumb | The Raw Story I never expected an endorsement from FOX or O'Reilly so maybe, just maybe we might be turning a corner.
PS Not that I am suggesting you start watching FOX.
It won't, but not for reasons of censorship. Two posts were moved to Politics - Quarantine Thread so I'm keeping the moderation to a minimum as long as people are well behaved, i.e. adults.
I'm applying a light hand because the thread isn't spinning into the abyss at the moment. I will continue to bat "trigger" posts as needed.
Don't get me wrong - the discussion here is excellent overall, even though it occasionally flirts with the abyss. I'm just keeping a lid on partisan bickering.
It got better on tonights show The OReilly | Fox News