DurandalAI
Member
Easement rights and eminent domain are big battles for infrastructure development of roads, etc. There's little protest to be made about a tunnel that's so far underground your home that it doesn't impact your home/life versus a road/railway that eats up a 30 foot wide swath of your land while producing large amounts of sound. I think that's his reasoning on it. If you can't see/hear/smell it, it's hard to have a NIMBY protest against such a project. Especially so in areas where population density would make such above-ground projects so difficult.I disapprove of wasting money on stupid *sugar* in a way which prevents people from spending money on things which would actually help.
While I'm sure it will morph over time -- since Elon is very good at changing course fast -- right now, Hyperloop consists of a bunch of proposals which are *less* efficient and *more* expensive than conventional high-speed rail and therefore stupid. And they aren't just worse due to lack of economies of scale, they are *inherently* worse.
This *vaporware* is basically being used as an excuse to not fund high speed rail.
Meanwhile, while Musk is correct that we can't seem to build rail at reasonable prices in the US, he hasn't bothered to figure out why. A large part of it is a construction mafia, basically. Another part is extremely expensive *surface construction* (for tunnel access points, etc.) -- the tunnel drilling is by far the most efficient part of the process. He's haring off in the wrong direction, and I hate to see this waste of effort.
Automated electric bulldozers would be a much more effective and useful dream.
Underground transport is also less vulnerable to high speed winds, rain, snow, idiots who want to put things on the rails, etc... I agree the cost is higher, but I think there would be less red tape associated with it, thus making it more successful.