You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remember, it's not a real loss until you sell!Ugh. What a day!
DIN was down $.04 today. I own 100 shares, so that's $4 out of my pocket.
Y'know, one could have small short position in NASDAQ for just such occasions.The NASDAQ really did a swan dive and TSLA is showing a similar drop. One need look no further than the macros. TSLA sometimes ignores macros, but it seldom ignores a swan dive by the NASDAQ. Also, today was supposed to be a red day, according to the 12 day pattern, and so you probably have some shorts selling to enhance the drop right now.
You beta be worried.
JP Morgan's top market guru just identified a chilling pattern in the stock market
JP Morgan's top market guru just identified a chilling pattern in the stock market
The decline in the market appears to have coincided with the publishing and circulation of a research note from JP Morgan strategist Marko Kolanovic, who among other things noted that the recent decline in stock correlations we’ve seen mirrors action investors saw before big sell-offs in 1994 and 2001.
“Over the past year, correlation of stocks and sectors declined at an unprecedented speed and magnitude,” Kolanovic wrote in a note to clients.
“A similar decorrelation occurred on only 2 other occasions over the last 30 years: in 1993 and 2000. Both of those episodes led to subsequent market weakness and an increase in volatility (in 1994, and 2001). The current decline in market correlations started following the US elections and was largely driven by macro (rather than stock specific) forces.”
A de-correlation in stocks basically means that individual stocks began moving in different directions at different times, rather than in the same direction at the same time.
Kolanovic notes that in 1994, a rise in interest rates and a re-correlation in the stock market saw a 10% correction. In 2000, with markets bouncing off lows made during the brief 1998 crisis triggered by Russia’s default and Long-Term Capital Management’s bankruptcy, correlations plummeted.
“It ended with the tech bubble in March 2001,” Kolanovic writes, “which marked the low pint of equity correlation and start of recession. Subsequently, the market declined ~30%, bottoming in late 2002.”
I really hope this is true. SP would go bananas.
[Speculation] Model 3 0.237 kwh/mile!
That the page was taken down by Tesla suggests there was some truth to the page. Trying not to get my hopes up, but it would truly be a mic drop moment if true.
It sounds like good news, but I don't think it would in any way make the stock price go "bananas" on it's own. I believe that everybody already expects the Model 3 to be a great car, and it is priced in. The thing that will make the stock price go bananas is any hint that production is going well, and accelerating at or ahead of schedule.I really hope this is true. SP would go bananas.
[Speculation] Model 3 0.237 kwh/mile!
Though I agree the Model 3 ramp is the focus. A surprise on the rated range would be a positive catalyst imo.It sounds like good news, but I don't think it would in any way make the stock price go "bananas" on it's own. I believe that everybody already expects the Model 3 to be a great car, and it is priced in. The thing that will make the stock price go bananas is any hint that production is going well, and accelerating at or ahead of schedule.
Though I agree the Model 3 ramp is the focus. A surprise on the rated range would be a positive catalyst imo.
I really hope this is true. SP would go bananas.
[Speculation] Model 3 0.237 kwh/mile!