AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
Ok. So probably 265/0.91 = 291 or so. Below 294 in any case. I guess I’d say 265/0.905, so 292 or 293, .View attachment 994885
The bars fill up.
We all know percentage is mostly useless (though a good mode to operate with in general).Just fricken give a percentage read
Certainly not useful for this discussion anyway (we just need to know what it is).
I’ve heard a 123kWh battery rumor (no idea if true of course), so that would put it at 420Wh/mi - yikes. Hopefully that ~293 rated miles is with 20” all-terrains and the not-so-aero covers.
Last edited: