Looks like you might need two range extenders lol….
I wonder what happened to the aerodynamics
I wonder what happened to the aerodynamics
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Again,
This is the same exact - to the letter - discussion that came out with the Tesla Model 3 5 years ago.
Same forum - same discussion - same. same. same.
Some 2 million cars ago - same discussion. same statements.
It WILL be the same discussion when the NEXT Tesla vehicle comes out. After about 1 million CT's will be sold and the CT attack will have died down, and the vultures will converge on the next vehicle.
Let's see - there are 42 pages so far. The model 3 had 109 or so pages so we have a long way to go.
This is the same exact - to the letter - discussion that came out with the Tesla Model 3 5 years ago.
Same forum - same discussion - same. same. same.
Some 2 million cars ago - same discussion. same statements.
It WILL be the same discussion when the NEXT Tesla vehicle comes out. After about 1 million CT's will be sold and the CT attack will have died down, and the vultures will converge on the next vehicle.
Let's see - there are 42 pages so far. The model 3 had 109 or so pages so we have a long way to go.
The only pic I could find was this.
So yeah, that extra rectangular brick on top of the windshield will do aerodynamics no favors.
Really?
Then you should be easily able to site it ... go for it ... do tells us where Tesla promised anyone 500+ mile range for Model 3.
Yeah, right.
Pumper'n'dumper flies off the handle ...
I could Easily show 900+ wh/mile in 20 miles launching my Plaid for 15 minutes. The fact that anyone is buying this crap let alone spreading it boggles the mind. Many seem pretty worried about the CT and the momentum it’s going to pick up. Sad that so many have dedicated their time and effort into such a mindless FUD parade.
zoomer0056
Active Member
Oh no.
Same discussion. Same comments. Same complaints. Thats what I said.
Whatever the range Tesla posted was for the P3D all of the comments were the same.
So a CT owner is trying to sabotage CT sales?
Interesting. Even if you feather it, we all know you getting anywhere near 300 miles.
EPA should have one set of rules that all manufacturers abide by. But they don’t.
AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
It does have one set of rules. It defines very exactly how the tests are performed. However, that set of rules also contains some variation in how the test results are translated into the final published numbers.
AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
The problem is that there are two major items which matter:
1) Mixed-use daily efficiency where you don't really care about range.
2) Actual highway range at 70-75mph.
For some reason the EPA has chosen to mostly focus on 1. And then (for reasons that I don't understand) they use that result to extrapolate range. This doesn't work though, for obvious reasons.
Anyway they should add a highway range test at 70-75mph. (For both ICE and electric of course.)
There's an argument to be made that they should also capture highway range performance in other non-optimal conditions to incentivize manufacturers to include heat pumps, etc., which is where the scalar value comes in. They could keep that scalar in some form, but I think they need to take a look at whether it is accurately representing the real-world gains in non-optimal scenarios, and adjust accordingly.
Last edited:
zoomer0056
Active Member
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/investing17-5bfc2b8fc9e77c00519aa64c.jpg)
Pump-and-Dump: Definition, How the Scheme is Illegal, and Types
Pump-and-dump is a manipulative scheme to boost the price of a security through fake recommendations based on false, misleading, or exaggerated statements.
Much like other Trucks on the market, it's another commuter with errands around town.
I stand by my prediction that there will be a lot of used CT's in Tesla inventory.
Similar threads
