This doesn't fit into the proposed "geofence every SpC within 200 miles of your house" that the OP was advocating for and it also doesn't address the point of my question. If I leave my house on a long-distance trip, say I'm headed to a destination that is 477 miles from my home, I will naturally stop at the SpC that is 170 miles from my house, no? So, how would they determine if I'm on a long-distance trip or not if they don't know where I'm headed? Expecting Tesla to micromanage every trip that every Tesla owner takes is just a ridiculously unrealistic expectation. I would also posit that a 200-mile trip IS a long-distance trip, so setting such a long distance as your parameter is also unrealistic. I would also posit that a "long-distance trip" doesn't automatically translate to a linear distance from one's home. One can accumulate a high number of miles in one trip and not be further than 100 miles away from where you live. I live in Texas, trust me, we have a LOT of space here. The argument against local supercharging stands purely upon the issue of intent and intent alone. If you are doing it solely to take advantage of free electrons rather than out of necessity, then it is a infraction. This is why it is difficult to come up with an easy solution, because intent is always hard to determine. To suppose that no one will ever have a legitimate reason for needing to use a supercharger within 200 or 100 or even 50 miles from one's home would demonstrate that one hasn't completely considered the issue and that they may have a very narrow idea as to the purpose of the network and what constitutes a "long-distance" trip.