Lasairfion
Member
The more choice the better. Elon isn't rushing towards the last man standing, or rather last car manufacturer standing, he's trying to push change in the industry. So bring on more EVs and chargers.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bjoern Nyland got 205 miles of range in winter. It'll be interesting to see more real world results. The EPA figure seems a little pessimistic compared to the WLTP number and early tests.For me a range of 204 would be limiting in the winter. For daily use it would be fine but in the winter range will be a lot less than 204.
Family car is a Porsche 911? You must be German. What a ridiculous analogy.......Well yeah, that's a good thing it's not much different than a standard Audi.
Too small? You must be American.
My family car currently is a Porsche 911.
It fits skis or bikes on the roof rack no problem, you can put enough stuff in the back seats lol.
Too small? You must be American.
My family car currently is a Porsche 911.
It fits skis or bikes on the roof rack no problem, you can put enough stuff in the back seats lol.
I've never gotten anywhere close to the rated range on either the Model S or the Model 3 in any real world driving. Now sure I can get there on a summer day if I drive slow.
Sure I can get there by using the smaller uglier tires/wheels. But, for all practical purposes the rated range is meaningless to me. So on that one I'm going to wait to see what people actually experience. The Germans tend to be more conservative with numbers they give than Tesla tends to be.
Cruising at 60 mph then yes it makes 325. The AWD on 19" is much less efficient. I would say range is about 280 under similar conditions. Maybe a little less. Since the EPA numbers are under the same cycle they are good for comparison. However, every Tesla Model 3 was only tested with 18" Aero rims and tires.
Congrats. At least you get the virtual rear view mirrors...waiting to see one in person in VA.Picked mine up 3 weeks ago.
It's awesome, driving in Switzerland, I usually get a range of 370km. Charging is super fast, 150kW until 80%, 50kW all the way to 100%.
Build quality is superb, Audi A6 / Q7 like. Inside it is by far the quietest car I ever had, even quieter than a Mercedes S Class.
I am not missing the Tesla Model S yet that I had before.
View attachment 399822
1. Let's see charging 20% to 90% (which I assume applies to all BEV cars).
2. Does it get cold in Switzerland?
3. Maybe the eTron has a heat pump?
4. Maybe the eTron has no issue charging to 100% regularly?
5. Maybe the eTron has more headroom in the battery when it's below say 10%?
What's the track record on the longevity of the Audi Battery?
1. Charge curve below.
2. Yes of course, we got the Alps
3. Yes it does
4. So far no problem charging to 100%. It does it at 50kW
5. Yeah maybe, but I don't know
View attachment 404604
1. Well you can charge any EV to 100%. The question is if you routinely leave it at 100% what does that do to longevity.
I was joking that it gets cold in Switzerland.
2. My comments regarding 20%-90% has nothing to do with the charge curve. What is the recommended useable range of the battery. If your saying 0-100% daily with no longevity issues I guess Elon should close up shop.
3. If it’s like every other EV, 204 miles is really too little for a lot of folks. Because you can’t use the whole battery. And the huge hit in the cold. Perhaps it’s only 20% hit, in winter with the heat pump.
4. The only plus I see is that it has a heat pump. The biggest negative is that it’s made by the dieselgate folks and I will never buy another car from them. I had 5. I’ll never forget what they did.
4. I never had problems with my Audi Diesel cars. They're great. In fact, my wife still drives an Audi A6 3.0 TDI which is pretty good and get's great fuel economy.
I really couldn't care less about that Diesel hysteria.Only problem is their diesels were deliberately (not accidentally, that's the key here, deliberately) poisoning everyone around you. And you reward them, I won't.
Or it simply has a larger usable range buffer than the Teslas ...My comments regarding 20%-90% has nothing to do with the charge curve. What is the recommended useable range of the battery. If your saying 0-100% daily with no longevity issues I guess Elon should close up shop.
Or it simply has a larger usable range buffer than the Teslas ...
Not really. It's possible that 100% displayed charge on an Audi uses a lower percentage of the actual battery capacity than 100% displayed charge on a Tesla. I.e. a larger part of the capacity is not user accessible. If that's the case, frequently charging the Audi to "100%" may not be harmful. It would also explain why it can maintain peak charging power longer than Tesla.It might. That's what I'm asking.
This is exactly the case. Audi prevents you from charging to the true 100% SOC. This allows them to charge faster up to the user limit and also allows them to hide degradation by moving the user limit so that the usable kWh is constant as the car ages through the warranty period. Beyond the warranty, who knows what will happen. I'm not sure most automakers care what happens beyond that. VW certainly didn't care that my Passat V6 30V consumed 3qt/5000miles from new. They would not do anything about it under warranty until the engine oil consumption was 1qt/1000miles. They were very smart. The oil consumption didn't kill the first catalytic converter until it was 5000 miles outside the emissions warranty.Not really. It's possible that 100% displayed charge on an Audi uses a lower percentage of the actual battery capacity than 100% displayed charge on a Tesla. I.e. a larger part of the capacity is not user accessible. If that's the case, frequently charging the Audi to "100%" may not be harmful. It would also explain why it can maintain peak charging power longer than Tesla.
e-tron sounds perfect for your expectations - enjoyI've never gotten anywhere close to the rated range on either the Model S or the Model 3 in any real world driving. Now sure I can get there on a summer day if I drive slow.
Sure I can get there by using the smaller uglier tires/wheels. But, for all practical purposes the rated range is meaningless to me. So on that one I'm going to wait to see what people actually experience. The Germans tend to be more conservative with numbers they give than Tesla tends to be.
Now I don't expect it to be as efficient since nothing about the E-tron screams efficiency. Instead it looks to be a vehicle designed to trade off efficiency in favor of more durability, and a more richer interior. I imagine it's quieter inside than either the Model Y, or the X.
I keep going back to the charging network because it's the one thing Tesla did so well on that it's hard for anyone else to compete. It's not just how they did the supercharging network with how many stalls (on average) a site has, but it's also the destination chargers as well. It's so well done that I don't even need to stop at a supercharger on my trips to Portland. If I drive conservatively I can do the almost 200 miles trip without stopping to charge. I simply book a hotel that has destination charging.
I preferred the UI of the S because I could have all the information I wanted displayed where I wanted it. I really felt at home in that vehicle and part of me is kinda bummed I traded it in.
The UI in the 3/Y is clearly designed with autonomous driving in mind. That would be fine if we had autonomous driving, but instead Tesla is taking an iterative approach to autonomous driving.
The iterative approach means that the UI/UX of the vehicle needs to be aware of what the driver is doing (are they paying attention), and it needs to notify the driver to what it detects.
As it is right now drivers like myself miss half the notifications the car tells us. It's off to the side, and I'm paying attention to the road. I really wish Tesla would add a notification history. I'd also like them to add the notifications to to the dashcam video (like a closed captioning that could be turned on/off).
We also struggle with torque sensor failing to detect our hands properly. Even if it did work better it still would be in inadequate way to measure driver engagement.
I think it's too early to tell what the Model Y will have. Over the next year or so I expect Tesla/Elon to transition away from the torque sensor to a system similar to what the Cadillac Supercruise system uses.