Yes, because it's factual.
, but where in the DMV correspondence does Tesla say fsdb is and only is City Streets?
The document repeatedly makes it clear that fsdb IS city streets. It's two names for the same thing.
Pretty much throughout the correspondence where DMV asks for a demo of "the FSD beta release", Tesla provides one- and Tesla lists specific deployment dates, specific documentation provided to testers (internal and then external), etc.... through the entire thing all the things the public saw released as fsdb exactly match what Tesla ALSO refers to repeatedly as BOTH city streets internally and the fsd beta externally.
Because they are 2 names for the same thing.
Tesla doesn't say "We will demo the city streets part of fsdb"
They say city streets IS the beta. That's the thing. And it's all level 2, and intended to STAY level 2.
The OEDR is incapable of >L2 and we have no plans to add that.
We plan to produce some FUTURE software that will be >L2. This is not it.
Like you've been told roughly 9738 times now.
So now fsdb will never include ASS? That's news to me.
....what?
I said fsdb was level 2 and would always remain so. Because that's what Tesla said.
I said fsdb would not have any GREATER than L2 features added to it in the final version. Because that's what Tesla said.
Neither of Tesla in the emails, nor I at all, have said anything about ASS.
Moreover NOTHING in fsdb has changed how any variant of summon works at all. Because summon isn't part of fsdb.
It's entirely possible Tesla plans to leverage some of the same things fsdb DOES contain to improve summon.
But we've also not seen anything from Tesla saying that would be capable of >L2 EITHER so I'm unclear why you even mention it...unless you have some source that states conclusively the next update to summon will magically be >L2?
Do you?
Seems like you're making this stuff up.
I mean, I keep directly citing Teslas own words proving you wrong.
And even your own words where you keep contradicting yourself over and over-- or your own words where you tell us Tesla is lying, then deny you said it and ask for proof--- which I provide, and you then deny yet again.
Whereas your own entire argument seems to be based on what you "feel" "could" happen even in direct contradiction of what Tesla themselves says. And your feeling is based on.....literally nothing you have shared with us.
So my side:
Here's Teslas actual words saying everything you are posting is wrong.
Here's your side:
Tesla can just totally do the opposite of everything they said because.... REASONS!
'Which one of those seems made up?
(spoiler: it's yours)
They can change it since it's a made-up marketing term. They just need to email the DMV again to inform them of the changes.
I mean, again, if your argument is Tesla repeatedly lied to the DMV, then sure, they can just tell the DMV they were lying every time they directly replied to a DMV question about current and future expected capabilities of a specific piece of software.
It's an incredibly dumb thing for you to suggest they would do of course.
And makes no actual sense.
But it COULD be done.
Tesla could also send employees to start robbing banks too. That's a thing they COULD do.
They won't do that any more than they'll tell the DMV none of their previous certifications about the software known as both fsdb and city streets wasn't true though.
7 pages of you two arguing...I can totally see 
