caddieo
Member
Cute, but no. The finish products are marketed to consumers not as "preserve your new car shine," but as improvements, for instance:
http://www.carid.com/universal-detailing/mothers-california-gold-products-1642290.html
http://www.griotsgarage.com/product/car+care/car+waxing/car+waxes+and+sealants/best+of+show+wax.do
http://www.meguiars.com/en/automotive/products/g18211-ultimate-wax-paste/
http://www.zainostore.com/Merchant2..._Code=Z-2&Category_Code=Zaino&Product_Count=8
etc.
The purpose of a paint finish is to preserve the car's clear coat. It's an easily replaceable sacrificial layer. But, it's come to mean improving the paint's gloss and "depth." I find it interesting that according to CR, they don't significantly enhance, so the most they can do is protect. And yes, I don't trust CR to be truly critical. CR doesn't look at things the way experts in the relevant fields do. That applies to their tool reviews, their cooking item reviews, their car reviews, and I'll bet their paint finish reviews. CR helps people who don't really know what's going on avoid bad things, not get the best.
So now that the CR review of the Tesla S has come out, do you still have the same opinion about them?