This is science, it's not something to toy with...it's not something to say I choose not to believe E=mc2, you don't have that option.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is science, it's not something to toy with...it's not something to say I choose not to believe E=mc2, you don't have that option.
TerraPass carbon offsets support emission reduction projects in communities around the United States. Every 1,000lbs you purchase destroys greenhouse gases equivalent to 1,000lbs of carbon dioxide, or burning 51 gallons of gasoline!
The firm’s latest disclosure form reports that its in-house corporate lobbying team spent $3.1 million to influence lawmakers over the first three months of the year on a variety of issues affecting its bottom line, including the EPA’s Clean Power Rule on carbon emissions, carbon pricing, the Clean Air Act and “nominations for various positions at the Department of Energy.”
SL: How do you feel about the work you did in those years?
JT: I regret a lot of it. I wish I had taken more care and done more due diligence on the arguments I had been forwarding.
Canada is the seventh-largest producer of wind power in the world.
In 2015, China produced 29 per cent of the world’s hydroelectric power, followed by Canada at 10 per cent.
The portion of all electricity in Canada generated by renewables is now 66 per cent, up from 60 per cent a decade earlier.
It's embarrassing living in my province, where the government wants to go more into coal.Canada's increasing renewable electricity generation, and comparisons to China.
Two-thirds of electricity in Canada now comes from renewable energy
As a US citizen, let me just say: I understand.It's embarrassing living in my province, where the government wants to go more into coal.
Good article.Well-written article from Rolling Stone, on Antarctica: The Doomsday Glacier
I know Claude Shannon said this was the ultimate unit of information. I don't know if this helps but I've always been puzzled by this, especially as Gregory Bateson says in his Steps to an Ecology of Mind, that the importance of things is a difference which makes a difference. The way I like to understand this is meaning is an improvement on the basic unit of information. We attach meaning to those differences which make a difference. Meaning is about relationships. Unless I'm looking at it I cannot sense when at rest where my right index finger is, but if I press it against my thumb, I do.
At the same time as my conservative critics, not here, y'all too smart for that, say my tolerance is really a denial that there is objective truth. What science deals with are those observable relationships that can in principle be agreed to by anyone, anywhere and anywhen. (I know, not a word, but it should be.) That agreement can be falsified by new evidence. So if one blasphemes by talking about what God says few religions are truly open ended. Critics like Jaroslav Pelikon say "traditionalism is the dead faith of the living, whereas tradition is the living faith of the dead." Moral guidance for me comes from Kant's categorical imperative. As my first father-in-law, a professional expert on Kant used to say at Sunday dinners before we were both in our cups, something like this about Kant. "If you want to do the right thing when faced with a decision, try to act in accordance with a universal rule which anyone would follow when faced with this decision." Sounds like good advice and modeled on the goal of science, as above, in empirical matters.
Ever in search of diversion: I attended public events in the fifties at Harvard when Kissinger was a lowly associate professor and did not have an accent. He told a joke about Anatole France when asked if he knew Kant: "I don't know. I've read nine volumes, they tell me the verb is in the tenth." Speaking of relationships, it was quite amusing to watch Kissinger when William Yandell Elliott, who was a full professor, got up to speak, say, about accompanying Nixon when he had his "kitchen debate" with Khrushchev.
Interesting perspective in the Guardian this morning.
Yes, I am a climate alarmist. Global warming is a crime against humanity
Yes, I am a climate alarmist. Global warming is a crime against humanity | Lawrence Torcello
"There can be no greater crime against humanity than the foreseeable, and methodical, destruction of conditions that make human life possible – hindsight isn’t necessary.
Scientists confirm, in overwhelming consensus, the fundamental facts that make anthropogenic global warming a clear and present threat to humanity and other species.
There is no amount of ideological deception capable of altering basic physics, chemistry and biology. It is ethically untenable for intelligent people to look the other way while elected officials deny reality, and our opportunity to avoid catastrophe slips away."